Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: the user is navigated without showing the Not Found Page when deleting a money request or IOU report #33041

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Dec 20, 2023

Conversation

dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 commented Dec 14, 2023

Details

When deleting a money request or IOU report, the user is navigated without showing the Not Found Page

Fixed Issues

$ #28969
PROPOSAL: #28969 (comment)

Tests

  1. Open the app
  2. Navigate to a chat without previous IOUs
  3. Send 3 money requests
  4. Open the money request detail screen
  5. Tap three dots and delete a money request
  6. Verify that the user is navigated to the money request preview
  7. In the IOU report, when there is one money request left, delete it
  8. Verify that the user is redirected to the chat report and should not see the not found page
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Open the app
  2. Navigate to a chat without previous IOUs
  3. Send 3 money requests
  4. Open the money request detail screen
  5. Tap three dots and delete a money request
  6. Verify that the user is navigated to the money request preview
  7. In the IOU report, when there is one money request left, delete it
  8. Verify that the user is redirected to the chat report and should not see the not found page
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android-resize.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
chrome-resize.mov
iOS: Native
ios-resize.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
safari-resize.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web-resize.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop-resize.mov

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 changed the title Fix/28969 Fix: the user is navigated without showing the Not Found Page when deleting a money request or IOU report Dec 14, 2023
@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 marked this pull request as ready for review December 14, 2023 10:13
@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 14, 2023 10:13
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from s77rt and removed request for a team December 14, 2023 10:13
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 14, 2023

@s77rt Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@@ -317,7 +326,8 @@ function ReportScreen({
prevOnyxReportID === routeReportID &&
!onyxReportID &&
prevReport.statusNum === CONST.REPORT.STATUS.OPEN &&
(report.statusNum === CONST.REPORT.STATUS.CLOSED || (!report.statusNum && !prevReport.parentReportID && prevReport.chatType === CONST.REPORT.CHAT_TYPE.POLICY_ROOM)))
(report.statusNum === CONST.REPORT.STATUS.CLOSED || (!report.statusNum && !prevReport.parentReportID && prevReport.chatType === CONST.REPORT.CHAT_TYPE.POLICY_ROOM))) ||
((ReportUtils.isMoneyRequest(prevReport) || ReportUtils.isMoneyRequestReport(prevReport)) && _.isEqual(report, defaultProps.report))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of comparing to the default report props, let's just reuse the !report.statusNum condition

(!report.statusNum && ((!prevReport.parentReportID && prevReport.chatType === CONST.REPORT.CHAT_TYPE.POLICY_ROOM) || (the new condition)))

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@s77rt I don't think this gonna work. since the code that you provided need prevReport.statusNum === CONST.REPORT.STATUS.OPEN
But I added a console.log the prevReport.statusNum is 1 which means 'SUBMITTED' not 'OPEN'

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That makes sense. In that case just use _.isEmpty(report) instead of comparing with default prop (it's a little more readable)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code updated. Please help review again.

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Dec 15, 2023

@dukenv0307 Conflicts please

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@s77rt Updated.

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Dec 18, 2023

@dukenv0307 If we delete a IOU request the report will show skeleton view, can we prevent that as well?

ios.mov

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@s77rt I think showing a loading screen after deleting makes sense since this is like normal navigation.
Especially in the scenario that the user is seeing that IOU report, then the sender deletes it, the user will see a loading screen and then be navigated to the chat report.

But if you insist, we can update the condition of showing ReportActionsSkeletonView

{(!isReportReadyForDisplay || isLoadingInitialReportActions || isLoading) && <ReportActionsSkeletonView />}

to

{((!isReportReadyForDisplay && !wasReportAccessibleRef.current) || isLoadingInitialReportActions || isLoading) && <ReportActionsSkeletonView />}

Please let me know your opinion on this

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Dec 19, 2023

I don't think that's a blocker.

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Dec 19, 2023

@dukenv0307 Can you please specify that the user should not see the not found page

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Dec 19, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Can't test due to an ongoing issue https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1702883604941629

Android: mWeb Chrome
mweb-chrome.mov
iOS: Native
ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
mweb-safari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@s77rt

Can you please specify that the user should not see the not found page

Updated in test steps

I don't think that's a blocker.

I don't think I fully understand your point. Should we keep the current showing loading screen when navigating logic or update the code so that the loading screen does not appear

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Dec 20, 2023

Should we keep the current showing loading screen when navigating logic

Yes.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from francoisl December 20, 2023 14:14
@francoisl francoisl merged commit 463ca55 into Expensify:main Dec 20, 2023
17 of 18 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 1.4.15-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 1.4.15-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants