-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: export link regex for use in edit message #540
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9fa31fc
fix: export link regex for use in edit message
sangar-1028 ec5c6de
Merge branch 'main' into fix/issue-18911
sangar-1028 127ab03
fix: move MARKDOWN_LINK_REGEX to Url.js
sangar-1028 2e0bc91
fix: MARKDOWN_LINK_REGEX move back to ExpensiMark.js
sangar-1028 1d5e6ac
fix: move extractLinksInMarkdownComment and getRemovedMarkdownLinks f…
sangar-1028 b8c6e59
fix: lint error
sangar-1028 7312a08
fix: remove duplicated code related to MARKDOWN_LINK_REGEX
sangar-1028 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ const LOOSE_URL_REGEX = `((${LOOSE_URL_WEBSITE_REGEX})${URL_PATH_REGEX}(?:${URL_ | |
|
||
|
||
const MARKDOWN_URL_REGEX = `(${LOOSE_URL_REGEX}|${URL_REGEX})`; | ||
const MARKDOWN_LINK_REGEX = `\\[([^\\][]*(?:\\[[^\\][]*][^\\][]*)*)]\\(${MARKDOWN_URL_REGEX}\\)(?![^<]*(<\\/pre>|<\\/code>))`; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This doesn't seem relevant here because it is about links, not just URLs. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Moved to ExpensiMark.js |
||
|
||
export { | ||
URL_WEBSITE_REGEX, | ||
|
@@ -28,4 +29,5 @@ export { | |
LOOSE_URL_REGEX, | ||
LOOSE_URL_WEBSITE_REGEX, | ||
MARKDOWN_URL_REGEX, | ||
MARKDOWN_LINK_REGEX, | ||
}; |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here's we're building a regex with the
'gi'
flags, but in App we're using the'gm'
flags. That's an example of an inconsistency with this approach.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@neil-marcellini
I think
gi
flag is intentional not to parse multiline link. In App, we'll be usinggi
flags as well.Actually,
ExpensiMark
uses this flag for bothlink
andautolink
at the moment.