Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bring back code to support JAXRS v1 (revert #134 for 2.18) #192

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 26, 2024

Conversation

pjfanning
Copy link
Member

@pjfanning pjfanning commented Jul 26, 2024

#134 is causing real problems for Apache Hadoop and a great deal of the ecosystem of Big Data libs and tools that need to support Hadoop.

A few developers have tried to get Hadoop off of JAXRS v1 (Jersey 1) but there has been no success.

#134 has forced Hadoop to stick to Jackson 2.12 and that version is getting increasingly stale.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15984 is the related Hadoop issue.

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Shit. Do we really have to bring this crap back in? :-( :-( :-(

Just need to double check it won't sneak in master/3.0.

@pjfanning
Copy link
Member Author

Let's not include in v3/master. But I would appreciate it if we could add it back to 2.x releases.

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

@pjfanning Yeah, I get the problem & solution. Just feeling grumpy about legacy issues, having hoped this was not necessary. Will merge today so we can help Hadoop project and possibly others.

Thank you for working on this.

@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder changed the title bring back code to support JAXRS v1 Bring back code to support JAXRS v1 (revert #134 for 2.18) Jul 26, 2024
@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder merged commit 9931b19 into FasterXML:2.18 Jul 26, 2024
4 checks passed
@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Merged and added a note on:

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.18

(feel free to modify/augment what I added)

@pjfanning pjfanning deleted the support-jaxrs-v1 branch July 27, 2024 09:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants