Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: improve observability for procedure #4675

Open
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

realtaobo
Copy link
Contributor

@realtaobo realtaobo commented Sep 4, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA.

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

Resolve #3999

What's changed and what's your intention?

I'm working on resolving issue #3999, which includes the following main tasks:

  1. Adding a new RPC interface to query all undeleted procedure metadata.
  2. Introducing the information_schema.procedure_info table.
mysql> select * from information_schema.procedure_info \G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
  procedure_id: 140ae3dd-da22-4f5d-a447-debe55e6bbb1
procedure_type: metasrv-procedure::DropTable
    start_time: 2024-09-13 14:42:29.298000
      end_time: 2024-09-13 14:42:29.309000
        status: Done
     lock_keys: Share("__catalog_lock/greptime"),Share("__schema_lock/greptime.public"),Exclusive("__table_lock/1044")
*************************** 2. row ***************************
  procedure_id: 2a6d3155-b2c0-4503-81d7-a981393b08fb
procedure_type: metasrv-procedure::CreateTable
    start_time: 2024-09-13 14:42:33.490000
      end_time: 2024-09-13 14:42:33.498000
        status: Done
     lock_keys: Share("__catalog_lock/greptime"),Share("__schema_lock/greptime.public"),Exclusive("__table_name_lock/greptime.public.temperatures")
2 rows in set (0.01 sec)

Checklist

  • I have written the necessary rustdoc comments.
  • I have added the necessary unit tests and integration tests.
  • This PR requires documentation updates.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs-not-required This change does not impact docs. label Sep 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 4, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 21.89349% with 264 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.43%. Comparing base (36b1baf) to head (f410ee7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4675      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.79%   84.43%   -0.36%     
==========================================
  Files        1115     1116       +1     
  Lines      201200   201543     +343     
==========================================
- Hits       170598   170167     -431     
- Misses      30602    31376     +774     

src/catalog/src/system_schema/utils.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/common/procedure/src/local.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/common/procedure/src/local.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fengjiachun fengjiachun requested review from fengjiachun, waynexia and WenyXu and removed request for waynexia September 6, 2024 09:26
@WenyXu
Copy link
Member

WenyXu commented Sep 9, 2024

Does it print the lock_keys info?

@realtaobo

This comment was marked as outdated.

@WenyXu
Copy link
Member

WenyXu commented Sep 9, 2024

     lock_keys: __catalog_lock/greptime,__schema_lock/greptime.public,__table_name_lock/greptime.public.temperatures

It's better to print the type of lock, like read lock, write lock.

lock_keys: Read(__catalog_lock/greptime),Read(__schema_lock/greptime.public),Write(__table_name_lock/greptime.public.temperatures)

@MichaelScofield
Copy link
Collaborator

@realtaobo please resolve the conflicts first

Copy link
Member

@WenyXu WenyXu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work!

Some nitpicking:

  1. Only expose methods that you need
  2. Avoid redundant struct converting

src/common/procedure/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/common/procedure/src/local.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/common/procedure/src/local.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Mode::Standalone => {
if let Some(procedure_manager) = utils::procedure_manager(&self.catalog_manager)? {
let procedures = procedure_manager
.list_procedure()
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wondering if the list_procedure can be made into ProcedureExecutor. I think the codes can be more concise.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, It's not easy in Standalone mode. Because KvBackendCatalogManager seems doesn't method to hold a DdlManager which impl ProcedureExecutor trait. Maybe it is possible, but is the cost too high.

let catalog_manager = KvBackendCatalogManager::new(
dn_opts.mode,
None,
kv_backend.clone(),
layered_cache_registry.clone(),
);

Copy link
Contributor

@killme2008 killme2008 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A great work! I think after this PR is merged, we can re-implement the procedure_state function by querying this table.

@realtaobo
Copy link
Contributor Author

realtaobo commented Sep 13, 2024

Hi, all, resolved all comment, please take a look :)
The latest information_schema.procedure_info schema has been updated in the description.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs-not-required This change does not impact docs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

improve observability for procedure
4 participants