Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split Java code style checks #10532

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 21, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
59 changes: 57 additions & 2 deletions .github/workflows/tests.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ concurrency:

jobs:
checkstyle:
name: Code style check
name: Checkstyle
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout source
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -52,22 +52,77 @@ jobs:
with:
message: >
Your code currently does not meet JabRef's code guidelines.
We use [Checkstyle](https://checkstyle.sourceforge.io/) to identify issues.
The tool reviewdog already placed comments on GitHub to indicate the places. See the tab "Files" in you PR.
Please carefully follow [the setup guide for the codestyle](https://devdocs.jabref.org/getting-into-the-code/guidelines-for-setting-up-a-local-workspace/intellij-13-code-style.html).
Afterwards, please run checkstyle locally and fix the issues.


More information on code quality in JabRef is available at <https://devdocs.jabref.org/getting-into-the-code/development-strategy.html>.
comment_tag: checkstyle
reactions: eyes
openrewrite:
name: OpenRewrite
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout source
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
submodules: 'true'
show-progress: 'false'
- name: Set up JDK
uses: actions/setup-java@v3
with:
java-version: 21.0.1
distribution: 'liberica'
cache: 'gradle'
- name: Run OpenRewrite
run: |
./gradlew rewriteDryRun
- name: Add comment on pull request
if: ${{ failure() }}
uses: thollander/actions-comment-pull-request@v2
with:
message: >
Your code currently does not meet JabRef's code guidelines.
We use [OpenRewrite](https://docs.openrewrite.org/) to ensure "modern" Java coding practices.
The issues found can be **automatically fixed**.
Please execute the gradle task *`rewriteRun`*, check the results, commit, and push.


You can check the detailed error output at the tab "Checks", section "Tests" (on the left), subsection "OpenRewrite".
comment_tag: openrewrite
modernizer:
name: Modernizer
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout source
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
submodules: 'true'
show-progress: 'false'
- name: Set up JDK
uses: actions/setup-java@v3
with:
java-version: 21.0.1
distribution: 'liberica'
cache: 'gradle'
- name: Run modernizer
run: |
# enable failing of this task if modernizer complains
sed -i "s/failOnViolations = false/failOnViolations = true/" build.gradle
./gradlew modernizer
- name: Add comment on pull request
if: ${{ failure() }}
uses: thollander/actions-comment-pull-request@v2
with:
message: >
Your code currently does not meet JabRef's code guidelines.
We use [Gradle Modernizer Plugin](https://github.com/andygoossens/gradle-modernizer-plugin#gradle-modernizer-plugin) to ensure "modern" Java coding practices.
Please fix the detected errors, commit, and push.


You can check the detailed error output at the tab "Checks", section "Tests" (on the left), subsection "Modernizer".
comment_tag: modernizer
markdown-checks:
name: Markdown style check
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
Expand Down
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion .vscode/ltex.dictionary.en-US.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
Checkstyle
CouchDB
JabDrive
JabRef
CouchDB
OpenRewrite
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions docs/code-howtos/code-quality.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,12 +3,26 @@ parent: Code Howtos
---
# Code Quality

## Code style checkers

JabRef has three code style checkers in place:

* [Checkstyle](https://checkstyle.sourceforge.io/) for basic checks, such as wrong import order.
* [Gradle Modernizer Plugin](https://github.com/andygoossens/gradle-modernizer-plugin#gradle-modernizer-plugin) for Java library usage checks. It ensures that "modern" Java concepts are used (e.g., [one should use `Deque` instead of `Stack`](https://stackoverflow.com/a/73021741/873282)).
* [OpenRewrite](https://docs.openrewrite.org/) for advanced rules. OpenRewrite can also automatically fix issues. JabRef's CI toolchain does NOT automatically rewrite the source code, but checks whether OpenRewrite would rewrite something. As developer, one can execute `./gradlew rewriteRun` to fix the issues.

In case a check fails, [the CI](https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/blob/main/.github/workflows/tests.yml#L24C6-L24C6) automatically adds a comment on the pull request.

## Monitoring

We monitor the general source code quality at three places:

* [codacy](https://www.codacy.com) is a hosted service to monitor code quality. It thereby combines the results of available open source code quality checkers such as [Checkstyle](https://checkstyle.sourceforge.io) or [PMD](https://pmd.github.io). The code quality analysis for JabRef is available at [https://app.codacy.com/gh/JabRef/jabref/dashboard](https://app.codacy.com/gh/JabRef/jabref/dashboard), especially the [list of open issues](https://app.codacy.com/gh/JabRef/jabref/issues/index). In case a rule feels wrong, it is most likely a PMD rule. The JabRef team can change the configuration at [https://app.codacy.com/p/306789/patterns/list?engine=9ed24812-b6ee-4a58-9004-0ed183c45b8f](https://app.codacy.com/p/306789/patterns/list?engine=9ed24812-b6ee-4a58-9004-0ed183c45b8f).
* [codecov](https://codecov.io) is a solution to check code coverage of test cases. The code coverage metrics for JabRef are available at [https://codecov.io/github/JabRef/jabref](https://codecov.io/github/JabRef/jabref).
* [Teamscale](https://www.cqse.eu/en/teamscale/overview/) is a popular German product analyzing code quality. The analysis results are available at <https://demo.teamscale.com/findings.html#/jabref/?>.

## Background literature

We strongly recommend reading following two books on code quality:

* [Java by Comparison](http://java.by-comparison.com) is a book by three JabRef developers which focuses on code improvements close to single statements. It is fast to read and one gains much information from each recommendation discussed in the book.
Expand Down
Loading