Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: Bump toolchain, test prqlc for msrv #2621

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 24, 2023
Merged

Conversation

max-sixty
Copy link
Member

rust-analyzer is now raising mistaken errors for 1.65, as they only support the latest version rust-lang/rust-analyzer#12751 (comment)

We don't want to bump the required version because of #1561, but I think this approach:

  • Lets us work on an updated version
  • Tests prql-compiler & prqlc to ensure they don't fail to support 1.65
  • Doesn't let us use any new features in prql-compiler or prqlc until we bump the required version, but that's completely fine (is there even anything we'd use?)

`rust-analyzer` is now raising mistaken errors for 1.65, as they only support the latest version rust-lang/rust-analyzer#12751 (comment)

We don't want to bump the required version because of PRQL#1561, but I think this approach:
- Lets us work on an updated version
- Tests `prql-compiler` & `prqlc` to ensure they don't fail to support 1.65
- Doesn't let us use any new features in `prql-compiler` or `prqlc` until we bump the required version, but that's completely fine (is there even _anything_ we'd use?)
@max-sixty max-sixty requested a review from eitsupi May 24, 2023 09:44
Copy link
Member

@eitsupi eitsupi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense, thanks!

@eitsupi eitsupi enabled auto-merge (squash) May 24, 2023 11:14
@aljazerzen
Copy link
Member

is there even anything we'd use?

No, I've checked.

@eitsupi eitsupi merged commit 067d741 into PRQL:main May 24, 2023
max-sixty added a commit to max-sixty/prql that referenced this pull request May 24, 2023
In PRQL#2621 I realized that we didn't have to couple these — sorry for overcomplicating previously
@max-sixty max-sixty deleted the 1.66 branch May 25, 2023 18:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants