Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

event based temporal SEIR algorithm #1415

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023
Merged

event based temporal SEIR algorithm #1415

merged 16 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023

Conversation

ljeub-pometry
Copy link
Collaborator

@ljeub-pometry ljeub-pometry commented Dec 12, 2023

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Implement temporal SEIR using a priority queue

Why are the changes needed?

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? If yes is this documented?

New algorithm, documented

How was this patch tested?

added tests to check it matches theoretical results
basic python tests to check the different seeding options

Issues

Are there any further changes required?

@miratepuffin miratepuffin merged commit 736d208 into master Dec 15, 2023
10 checks passed
@miratepuffin miratepuffin deleted the feature/temporalSIR branch December 15, 2023 15:27
fabianmurariu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2024
* event based temporal SEIR algorithm

* fix the event queue so it is actually a min heap and return algorithm result

* add proper test

* add python interface

* improve the repr for AlgorithmResult

* more repr cleanup

* get rid of the Options in AlgorithmResult by only returning vertices that actually have results

* basic python test

* add python docs

* fix the docs ignores

* this should not be a doc comment

* bring back the AlgorithmResult docs hack

* fix formatting and actually include in docs

* no doctests for python!

* bring back missing import
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants