Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Review toolchain to setup the package #3

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 7, 2022
Merged

Review toolchain to setup the package #3

merged 6 commits into from
Aug 7, 2022

Conversation

RKrahl
Copy link
Owner

@RKrahl RKrahl commented Aug 7, 2022

Review toolchain to setup the package:

  • drop support for Python 3.3 and older,
  • use setuptools_scm to manage the version number,
  • various changes in the Makefile and the setup.py script,
  • changes to the documentation stub and tests.

@RKrahl
Drop support for Python older than 3.4
eb6b9f8
@RKrahl
Review setup:
934ac58 
- manage version number using setuptools_scm,
- autogenerate a _meta.py file containing the version number,
- apply on the fly substitutions to the distutils_pytest.py module and
  spec file,
- various cleanup.
@RKrahl
Minor fixup of setup.py
17324f7
@RKrahl
Review structure of the documentation stub and build scripts
43f73d4
@RKrahl
Minor tweaks in tests
997ede3
@RKrahl
Update changelog
38c4446
@RKrahl RKrahl merged commit 964f705 into master Aug 7, 2022
@RKrahl RKrahl deleted the setup branch August 7, 2022 21:27
@RKrahl RKrahl added the toolchain Related to the tools to build the package rather then to the package itself label Aug 8, 2022
@RKrahl RKrahl added this to the 0.2 milestone Aug 8, 2022
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
toolchain Related to the tools to build the package rather then to the package itself
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.2
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@RKrahl