Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lithium rebase #666

Open
wants to merge 105 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

ssun30
Copy link
Contributor

@ssun30 ssun30 commented Sep 19, 2024

This PR is intended to replace PR #605 . PR #648 introduced a lot of AEC and BAC values that conflict with those introduced in the original lithium branch. As a result, rebasing it onto the latest main could be a chore. I have separated lithium branch into two parts:

  1. This branch, which includes all the changes necessary to make the echem-rebase branch of RMG-Py function properly.

  2. Another branch that contains all the AECs, BACs, and new reference sets. It has not been rebased onto the latest main yet due to the large amount of conflicts.

I have created a backup branch that contains all the commits in lithium, but with commits involving quantum data moved to the end.

This PR also includes several new commits necessary to make CO2 reduction models.

The intention is to merge both this branch and the echem-rebase branch so we can get a minimum viable product that can do Li and CO2RR model generation.

davidfarinajr and others added 30 commits September 18, 2024 22:42
since desorbed mols are liquid phase, change in entropy with adsorption to surface should be less
Abraham and Mintz parameters fitted using COSMO-RS data and solute parameter database
viscosity parameters taken from DEC
Surface Carbonate CO 2F Decomposition is
left out because it results in 4 products which
RMG currently cannot handle
mjohnson541 and others added 23 commits September 18, 2024 22:43
… carbonate compounds

properties for the mixture are estimates
the old reactions were for an electronic state where the reaction was not barrierless
here we move to a higher up rule in the tree to estimate this particular reaction
based on Pynta calculations with a simple reaction error cancellation scheme
based on Pynta calculations
This is to make them consistent with Li families
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants