Adding the advcl:relcl subtype

[nschneid]

It has been decided that relative clauses modifying entire clauses, not nominals, should no longer be acl:relcl: UniversalDependencies/docs#886

This issue is to track English-specific implementation

[nschneid]

@amir-zeldes How are you handling edeprels given the type mismatch of "which" (PRON) and its clausal antecedent? I am thinking nsubj/obj for "which" at the basic level and csubj/ccomp as the enhanced dependency for its antecedent.

[nschneid]

some more GUM hits (as well as false positives) in:
http://universal.grew.fr/?custom=62e9b21aa045b
http://universal.grew.fr/?custom=62e9b7f6c21e5
http://universal.grew.fr/?custom=62e9b9167881c

[nschneid]

Was surprised how few adverbial acl:relcls were in EWT—turns out most of the adverbial relatives were parataxis.
Need to go through:

• http://universal.grew.fr/?custom=62ebc6c76f5eb
• http://universal.grew.fr/?custom=62ebc6a459a48

[nschneid]

• http://universal.grew.fr/?custom=62eaac2fdaf97: "which" marked as PronType=Int (the default for WH-pronouns) but not appearing in a typical relative clause context. Some are errors (ccomp should be advcl:relcl); some are relative clauses as full sentences, so should be PronType=Rel; others are truly interrogative. I will go through them and mark the truly interrogative ones with a MISC feature ManuallyChecked=PronType. (all addressed)

[amir-zeldes]

some more GUM hits (as well as false positives) in: http://universal.grew.fr/?custom=62e9b21aa045b http://universal.grew.fr/?custom=62e9b7f6c21e5 http://universal.grew.fr/?custom=62e9b9167881c

Thanks for reporting, there were two instances I'd missed in there!

[amir-zeldes]

@amir-zeldes How are you handling edeprels given the type mismatch of "which" (PRON) and its clausal antecedent? I am thinking nsubj/obj for "which" at the basic level and csubj/ccomp as the enhanced dependency for its antecedent.

Yeah, that looks good, just implemented it. I also saw cases of obl ->advcl and even csubj:pass once...

(2nd part moved to other thread)