Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade gatsby from 5.12.4 to 5.13.3 #530

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

X-oss-byte
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade gatsby from 5.12.4 to 5.13.3.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 20 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 23 days ago, on 2024-01-25.

The recommended version fixes:

Severity Issue PriorityScore (*) Exploit Maturity
Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JS-MSGPACKR-6140431
295/1000
Why? CVSS 5.9
No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: gatsby

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Copy link

stackblitz bot commented Feb 18, 2024

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 18, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 6cf514a

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Type: Enhancement

PR Summary: This pull request is an automated dependency upgrade initiated by Snyk to address a medium severity Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability by updating Gatsby from version 5.12.4 to 5.13.3. The upgrade ensures the project stays up-to-date with the latest version of Gatsby, which includes fixes for known vulnerabilities, performance improvements, and other enhancements.

Decision: Comment

📝 Type: 'Enhancement' - not supported yet.
  • Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.
✅ Issue addressed: this change correctly addresses the issue or implements the desired feature.
No details provided.
📝 Complexity: the changes are too large or complex for Sourcery to approve.
  • Unsupported files: the diff contains files that Sourcery does not currently support during reviews.

General suggestions:

  • Ensure thorough testing of the application after the dependency upgrade to verify that all functionalities work as expected and there are no regressions.
  • Review the release notes of Gatsby 5.13.3 for any breaking changes or new features that might require adjustments in the project.
  • Consider setting up automated dependency management tools, if not already in place, to regularly update dependencies and address vulnerabilities promptly.

Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨

Share Sourcery

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants