Ensure hidden files input is used #609
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
robherley
approved these changes
Sep 2, 2024
joshmgross
deleted the
joshmgross/fix-include-hidden-files-input-node16
branch
hogo6002
pushed a commit
to google/osv.dev
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2024
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [actions/setup-python](https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-python) | action | minor | `v5.1.1` -> `v5.2.0` | | [actions/upload-artifact](https://redirect.github.com/actions/upload-artifact) | action | minor | `v3.1.3` -> `v3.2.1` | | [github/codeql-action](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action) | action | minor | `v2.25.12` -> `v2.26.6` | | [ossf/scorecard-action](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action) | action | minor | `v2.3.3` -> `v2.4.0` | | [pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish) | action | minor | `v1.9.0` -> `v1.10.1` | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>actions/setup-python (actions/setup-python)</summary> ### [`v5.2.0`](https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-python/compare/v5.1.1...v5.2.0) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-python/compare/v5.1.1...v5.2.0) </details> <details> <summary>actions/upload-artifact (actions/upload-artifact)</summary> ### [`v3.2.1`](https://redirect.github.com/actions/upload-artifact/releases/tag/v3.2.1) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/actions/upload-artifact/compare/v3.2.0...v3.2.1) #### What's Changed This fixes the `include-hidden-files` input introduced in https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact/releases/tag/v3.2.0 - Ensure hidden files input is used by [@​joshmgross](https://redirect.github.com/joshmgross) in [actions/upload-artifact#609 **Full Changelog**: actions/upload-artifact@v3.2.0...v3.2.1 ### [`v3.2.0`](https://redirect.github.com/actions/upload-artifact/releases/tag/v3.2.0) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/actions/upload-artifact/compare/v3.1.3...v3.2.0) #### Notice: Breaking Changes⚠️ We will no longer include hidden files and folders by default in the `upload-artifact` action of this version. This reduces the risk that credentials are accidentally uploaded into artifacts. Customers who need to continue to upload these files can use a new option, `include-hidden-files`, to continue to do so. See ["Notice of upcoming deprecations and breaking changes in GitHub Actions runners"](https://github.blog/changelog/2024-08-19-notice-of-upcoming-deprecations-and-breaking-changes-in-github-actions-runners/) changelog and [this issue](https://redirect.github.com/actions/upload-artifact/issues/602) for more details. #### What's Changed - V3 backport: Exclude hidden files by default by [@​SrRyan](https://redirect.github.com/SrRyan) in [actions/upload-artifact#604 **Full Changelog**: actions/upload-artifact@v3.1.3...v3.2.0 </details> <details> <summary>github/codeql-action (github/codeql-action)</summary> ### [`v2.26.6`](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.26.5...v2.26.6) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.26.5...v2.26.6) ### [`v2.26.5`](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.26.4...v2.26.5) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.26.4...v2.26.5) ### [`v2.26.4`](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.26.3...v2.26.4) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.26.3...v2.26.4) ### [`v2.26.3`](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.26.2...v2.26.3) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.26.2...v2.26.3) ### [`v2.26.2`](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.26.1...v2.26.2) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.26.1...v2.26.2) ### [`v2.26.1`](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.26.0...v2.26.1) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.26.0...v2.26.1) ### [`v2.26.0`](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.25.15...v2.26.0) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.25.15...v2.26.0) ### [`v2.25.15`](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.25.14...v2.25.15) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.25.14...v2.25.15) ### [`v2.25.14`](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.25.13...v2.25.14) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.25.13...v2.25.14) ### [`v2.25.13`](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.25.12...v2.25.13) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.25.12...v2.25.13) </details> <details> <summary>ossf/scorecard-action (ossf/scorecard-action)</summary> ### [`v2.4.0`](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/releases/tag/v2.4.0) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/compare/v2.3.3...v2.4.0) #### What's Changed This update bumps the Scorecard version to the v5 release. For a complete list of changes, please refer to the [v5.0.0 release notes](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard/releases/tag/v5.0.0). Of special note to Scorecard Action is the Maintainer Annotation feature, which can be used to suppress some Code Scanning false positives. Alerts will not be generated for any Scorecard Check with an annotation. - 🌱 Bump github.com/ossf/scorecard/v5 from v5.0.0-rc2 to v5.0.0 by [@​spencerschrock](https://redirect.github.com/spencerschrock) in [ossf/scorecard-action#1410 - 🐛 lower license sarif alert threshold to 9 by [@​spencerschrock](https://redirect.github.com/spencerschrock) in [ossf/scorecard-action#1411 ##### Documentation - docs: dogfooding badge by [@​jkowalleck](https://redirect.github.com/jkowalleck) in [ossf/scorecard-action#1399 #### New Contributors - [@​jkowalleck](https://redirect.github.com/jkowalleck) made their first contribution in [ossf/scorecard-action#1399 **Full Changelog**: ossf/scorecard-action@v2.3.3...v2.4.0 </details> <details> <summary>pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish (pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish)</summary> ### [`v1.10.1`](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/releases/tag/v1.10.1) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/compare/v1.10.0...v1.10.1) #### 🚑🔏 Oopsie... We missed a tiny bug in the attestations feature the other day The problem was that the distribution file validity check was failing on any valid distribution being present and ready to be signed. What a silly mistake! It's now been fixed via pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@0ab0b79, though. So everything's good! \-- [@​webknjaz](https://redirect.github.com/webknjaz)[💰](https://redirect.github.com/sponsors/webknjaz) > \[!IMPORTANT] > ✨ Despite this minor hiccup, we invite you to still opt into trying this feature out early. [It can be enabled](https://redirect.github.com/marketplace/actions/pypi-publish#generating-and-uploading-attestations) like this: > > ```yml > with: > attestations: true > ``` > > Leave feedback in [the v1.10.0 release discussion](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/discussions/255) or [the PR](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/236). **🪞 Full Diff**: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.10.0...v1.10.1 **🧔♂️ Release Manager:** [@​webknjaz 🇺🇦](https://redirect.github.com/sponsors/webknjaz) **🙏 Special Thanks** to [@​hugovk](https://redirect.github.com/hugovk)[💰](https://redirect.github.com/sponsors/hugovk) for [promptly validating the bug fix](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/issues/256#issuecomment-2325925847), mere minutes after I pushed it — I even haven't finished writing this text by then! ### [`v1.10.0`](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/releases/tag/v1.10.0) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/compare/v1.9.0...v1.10.0) #### 🔏 Anything fancy, eh? This time, [@​woodruffw](https://redirect.github.com/woodruffw)[💰](https://redirect.github.com/sponsors/woodruffw) implemented support for [PEP 740] attestations functionality in [#​236](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/issues/236) and [#​245](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/issues/245). This is a big deal, as it is a huge step forward to replacing what the deprecated GPG signatures used to provide in a more meaningful way. > \[!IMPORTANT] > ✨ Please, do opt into trying this feature out early. [It can be enabled](https://redirect.github.com/marketplace/actions/pypi-publish#generating-and-uploading-attestations) as follows: > > ```yml > with: > attestations: true > ``` > > Leave any feedback on this in [this release discussion](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/discussions/255) or [the PR](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/236). 🙏 And please, thank William for working on this amazing improvement for the ecosystem! The overall effort is tracked @&#[pypi/warehouse#15871, by the way. **🪞 Full Diff**: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.9.0...v1.10.0 **🧔♂️ Release Manager:** [@​webknjaz 🇺🇦](https://redirect.github.com/sponsors/webknjaz) [PEP 740]: https://peps.python.org/pep-0740/ </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - "before 6am on wednesday" in timezone Australia/Sydney, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 👻 **Immortal**: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get [config help](https://redirect.github.com/renovatebot/renovate/discussions) if that's undesired. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR was generated by [Mend Renovate](https://mend.io/renovate/). View the [repository job log](https://developer.mend.io/github/google/osv.dev). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzOC41OS4yIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiMzguNTkuMiIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6Im1hc3RlciIsImxhYmVscyI6WyJkZXBlbmRlbmNpZXMiXX0=-->
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
to AmadeusITGroup/otter
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2024
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | Age | Adoption | Passing | Confidence | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | [actions/upload-artifact](https://redirect.github.com/actions/upload-artifact) | action | patch | `v3.2.0` -> `v3.2.1` | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | | [sass](https://redirect.github.com/sass/dart-sass) | peerDependencies | minor | [`~1.77.0` -> `~1.78.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/sass/1.77.8/1.78.0) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | | [sass](https://redirect.github.com/sass/dart-sass) | devDependencies | minor | [`~1.77.0` -> `~1.78.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/sass/1.77.8/1.78.0) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>actions/upload-artifact (actions/upload-artifact)</summary> ### [`v3.2.1`](https://redirect.github.com/actions/upload-artifact/releases/tag/v3.2.1) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/actions/upload-artifact/compare/v3.2.0...v3.2.1) #### What's Changed This fixes the `include-hidden-files` input introduced in https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact/releases/tag/v3.2.0 - Ensure hidden files input is used by [@​joshmgross](https://redirect.github.com/joshmgross) in [actions/upload-artifact#609 **Full Changelog**: actions/upload-artifact@v3.2.0...v3.2.1 </details> <details> <summary>sass/dart-sass (sass)</summary> ### [`v1.78.0`](https://redirect.github.com/sass/dart-sass/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#1780) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/sass/dart-sass/compare/1.77.8...1.78.0) - The `meta.feature-exists` function is now deprecated. This deprecation is named `feature-exists`. - Fix a crash when using `@at-root` without any queries or children in the indented syntax. ##### JS API - Backport the deprecation options (`fatalDeprecations`, `futureDeprecations`, and `silenceDeprecations`) to the legacy JS API. The legacy JS API is itself deprecated, and you should move off of it if possible, but this will allow users of bundlers and other tools that are still using the legacy API to still control deprecation warnings. - Fix a bug where accessing `SourceSpan.url` would crash when a relative URL was passed to the Sass API. ##### Embedded Sass - Explicitly expose a `sass` executable from the `sass-embedded` npm package. This was intended to be included in 1.63.0, but due to the way platform-specific dependency executables are installed it did not work as intended. Now users can run `npx sass` for local installs or just `sass` when `sass-embedded` is installed globally. - Add linux-riscv64, linux-musl-riscv64, and android-riscv64 support for the `sass-embedded` npm package. - Fix an edge case where the Dart VM could hang when shutting down when requests were in flight. - Fix a race condition where the embedded host could fail to shut down if it was closed around the same time a new compilation was started. - Fix a bug where parse-time deprecation warnings could not be controlled by the deprecation options in some circumstances. </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Enabled. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 👻 **Immortal**: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get [config help](https://redirect.github.com/renovatebot/renovate/discussions) if that's undesired. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR was generated by [Mend Renovate](https://mend.io/renovate/). View the [repository job log](https://developer.mend.io/github/AmadeusITGroup/otter). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzOC41OS4yIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiMzguNTkuMiIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6Im1haW4iLCJsYWJlbHMiOlsiZGVwZW5kZW5jaWVzIl19-->
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In #604/#606, the
include-hidden-filesinput is never used so users cannot opt-into including hidden files in their artifact.With this change, we're now matching
v4.4.0which properly respects this input:https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact/blob/v4.4.0/src/upload/upload-artifact.ts#L27-L30