Add support for Authorize.net CIM gateway's getTransactionDetails request #3796
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
joeyparis
changed the title
getTransactionDetails request
|
Marking this "of interest" before a cleanup of stale PRs |
|
To provide a cleaner slate for the maintenance of the library, this PR/Issue is being labeled stale after 60 days without activity. It will be closed in 14 days unless you comment with an update regarding its applicability to the current build. Thank you! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds support Authorize.net CIM's
getTransactionDetailsmethod defined here: https://developer.authorize.net/api/reference/index.html#transaction-reporting-get-transaction-detailsThe method has worked for me without error in my own environment, but I am having trouble wrapping my head around how the remote/unit testing suites work making it difficult for me to write tests for this added functionality, let alone proper tests that confirm everything. Any guidance or assistance on testing would be greatly appreciated!