-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 643
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Design difference between Source Han Sans SC and Source Han Serif SC 2 #56
Comments
Thank you. A small number of these issues have been fixed for the forthcoming dot release, and some of them are Source Han Sans issues, not Source Han Serif ones. Also, some of them are intentional typeface design differences. I will go through this list in the next few days to determine their dispositions. |
Here's my analysis of the 21 glyph pairs that you identified:
In other words, you found five Source Han Serif issues (one new CN glyph needs to be added, three CN glyphs need to be fixed, and one TW glyph needs to be changed to a CN glyph) and five Source Han Sans ones (two CN glyphs need to be removed, and three CN glyphs need to be fixed). The rest are either addressed in the forthcoming Source Han Serif update, or are already known Source Han Sans issues. I will update the appropriate issues within the next day or two to consolidate the above, and then will close this issue. |
(Thank you, @miguelsousa, for turning my data above into a easy-to-read table.) The above changes are now either reflected in the appropriate issues (Source Han Serif) or in my own notes (Source Han Sans Version 2.000), and therefore consolidated. |
21 characters were found in Source Han Serif SC that have different design with Source Han Sans SC.
They are ⻁ (U+2EC1), ⻪ (U+2EEA), 懲 (U+61F2), 乑 (U+4E51), 堩 (U+5829), ⼬ (U+2F2C), 巆 (U+5DC6), 濹 (U+6FF9), 衋 (U+884B), 贗 (U+8D17), ⿋ (U+2FCB), 㗴 (U+35F4), 䙶 (U+4676), 䜛 (U+471B), 䞅 (U+4785), 䟡 (U+47E1), 𩻄 (U+29EC4), 㧤 (U+39E4), 㵮 (U+3D6E), 䎉 (U+4389), 䕎 (U+454E)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: