Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some CN glyphs are showing inappropriate JP forms for GB 18030 #432

Open
Marcus98T opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Some CN glyphs are showing inappropriate JP forms for GB 18030 #432

Marcus98T opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@Marcus98T
Copy link

Marcus98T commented Jun 28, 2023

As a supplement to this two-year-old issue about some CN glyphs having only TW/HK forms, I found out that several GB18030 hanzi are showing only Japanese traditional print forms which are inappropriate for CN use. All of them listed had v1 CN glyphs, although some of them might not need to be restored if merging of components like 人 and 子 favours JP forms in the next release.

Yes, I raised the issue before briefly, and it's mentioned before that GB 18030 does not define glyph standards, but it will be jarring to see what Mainland Chinese users will find as inappropriate traditional print forms (alongside Taiwan Ministry of Education forms) for rare/occasional use Chinese characters, especially if they're on a device that has Source Han Sans/Noto Sans CJK as the only UI font and cannot install custom fonts to replace the default UI font (at least without a difficult and hacky workaround).

This is due to the 65,535 glyph limit and the practicality of having to restrict the scope of PRC glyph conventions to only basic Simplified/Traditional characters as defined in the G0-G8 GB standards according to Unicode, and the Table of General Standard Chinese Characters (通用规范汉字表, Tongyong), with extra CN-style characters for other rare/occasional use characters if there's space. But if we still cannot fit them all even after merging the non-essential regional components, might as well limit the PRC glyph scope to only G0-G8 (roughly), forget about GE and have thousands of unreleased JP glyphs to replace all CN glyphs that are not part of G0-G8, but obviously this means a lot more glyphs will no longer follow PRC glyph conventions and it might raise more complaints from mainland Chinese users, so it's not going to happen either.

Granted about 95% of them are GE sources (GB Extension, which means rare characters not reflecting real world usage), but a few of them are within the basic Chinese standards which means CN glyphs absolutely must be restored or new ones created, with the highest priority. This will be noted in the tables if I decide the v1 CN glyph must be restored.

The following tables are mostly correct as of version 2.004 and they are for reference only. I might have to do this again for the next version whenever it comes.

The tables contain all the removed CN glyphs as documented in this issue (may not be entirely accurate due to some glyph renaming, etc.), and are sorted according to Japanese JIS Levels 1-4, with the rest on another table. About half of them need not be restored because they are practically identical to the JP glyphs.

Also applies to Serif, which can be seen here.

JIS Level 1

Unicode Character GB Source Restore v1 CN glyph? Comments
U+4E38   No  
U+4E5D   No  
U+4E7E   No  
U+4E80   No  
U+4E98   No  
U+4E9C GB Extension Depends This is regarding the feet removal issue at #293.
U+4F34   No  
U+4F38   No  
U+4F50   No  
U+501F   No  
U+5024 GB Extension Yes  
U+5039 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+5149   No  
U+514E   No  
U+5177   No  
U+51CB   No  
U+51DD   No  
U+51F8   No  
U+51F9   No  
U+5203   No  
U+5229   No  
U+5237   No  
U+523A   No  
U+5263 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+52A0   No  
U+52C9   No  
U+52E4   No  
U+5351   No  
U+535A   No  
U+5371   No  
U+53E9   No  
U+53F6   No  
U+5420   No  
U+5448   No  
U+5449 GB Extension Depends This is regarding the feet removal issue at #293.
U+5606   No  
U+5642   No  
U+565B GB Extension Yes  
U+5668   No  
U+570F GB Extension Yes  
U+5766   No  
U+57A3   No  
U+5835   No  
U+5841   No  
U+5869   No  
U+5897 GB Extension Depends The strokes are not very obvious. So that will depend on the merging of the 丷 components to the JP forms.
Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 18 52 37
U+58A8   No  
U+58EE   No  
U+5A2F GB Extension Yes  
U+5C3B   No  
U+5C4A   No  
U+5C60   No  
U+5CE0 GB Extension Yes  
U+5D16   No  
U+5DFB GB Extension Yes  
U+5DFD   No  
U+5E30 GB Extension No Related issue: #374 (see section Remapping of 帰 (U+5E30)). The v1 CN glyph is structurally identical to the v2 JP variant glyph.
Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 18 50 55
U+5E3D   No  
U+5E4C   No  
U+5E55   No  
U+5F3E GB Extension Yes  
U+5FA1   No  
U+5FB3 GB Extension Yes  
U+60A9 GB Extension Yes, and adjust The v1 CN glyph has a problem with the bottom part being slanted, see this comment on another unrelated issue.
Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 18 55 58
U+60AA   No  
U+6163   No  
U+621A   No  
U+62B1   No  
U+62D0   No  
U+62E0   No  
U+63FA GB Extension Yes  
U+656C   No  
U+65ED   No  
U+660E   No  
U+6643   No  
U+66F3   No  
U+671D   No  
U+673A   No  
U+6751   No  
U+676F G0, GB 2312 Adjust JP glyph instead See issue #308.
U+67FE   No  
U+683C   No  
U+683D   No  
U+685C GB Extension Yes  
U+68EE   No  
U+691C GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+697D   No  
U+69D8 GB Extension Probably no Slightly different strokes at the bottom right of the v1 CN glyph, probably not an issue.
Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 18 51 02
U+69FB   No  
U+69FD   No  
U+6A2A   No  
U+6A3D   No  
U+6B69 GB Extension Yes  
U+6BCE GB Extension Yes  
U+6CC9   No  
U+6CE1   No  
U+6D1B   No  
U+6DAF   No  
U+6DEB   No  
U+6DFB   No  
U+6E09 GB Extension Yes  
U+6E20   No  
U+6E2F   No  
U+6E80 GB Extension Yes  
U+6F22   No  
U+6F5C   No  
U+701E   No  
U+7026   No  
U+7114   No  
U+724C   No  
U+731F   No  
U+73ED   No  
U+7433   No  
U+7554   No  
U+7565   No  
U+756A   No  
U+77A5   No  
U+7832   No  
U+7872 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+7891   No  
U+79A6   No  
U+79E4   No  
U+7A0B   No  
U+7A17   No  
U+7A3D   No  
U+7A42   No  
U+7B95   No  
U+7BB8   No  
U+7C82 GB Extension Yes  
U+7F6B   No  
U+7FA4   No v1 CN looks identical to the JP glyph, so it was an exact duplicate glyph that was removed in v2.
U+8036   No  
U+8074 GB Extension Yes  
U+80BA   No  
U+80DE   No  
U+8133 GB Extension Yes, and adjust The v1 CN glyph has a problem with the bottom part being slanted, see this comment on another unrelated issue.
Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 18 56 24
U+817A   No  
U+81D3 GB Extension Yes  
U+820E GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+8217 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+8304   No  
U+831C   No  
U+8358   No  
U+8461   No  
U+84B2   No  
U+8511   No  
U+853D   No  
U+85AF   No  
U+86FE   No  
U+898F   No  
U+8CCA   No  
U+8CCE   No  
U+8CED   No  
U+8D77 G0, GB 2312 No I would rather remove the feet from the JP glyph as per issue #293.
U+8ECD   No  
U+8F09   No  
U+916A   No  
U+9192   No  
U+91A4   No  
U+92AD GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+967A GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+9686   No  
U+96B7   No  
U+96EA   No  
U+96F7   No  
U+9759   No  
U+976D   No  
U+981A GB Extension Yes  
U+99C1   No  
U+99C5   No  
U+99C6 GB Extension Yes  
U+99C8 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 𠂆 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+99D2   No  
U+9A12   No  
U+9A13 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+9A28   No  
U+9A5A   No  
U+9C52   No  
U+9CF6   No  
U+9D0E GB Extension Yes  
U+9D60   No  
U+9E78 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+9EDB   No  

JIS Level 2

Unicode Character GB Source Restore v1 CN glyph? Comments
U+4E17   No  
U+4E55 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 𠂆 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+4E62 GB Extension Yes  
U+4FFE   No  
U+5056   No  
U+50D6   No  
U+5116 GB Extension Yes  
U+51A4   No  
U+51A9 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 臼 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+51AA   No  
U+51B2   No  
U+51B5   No  
U+51C5   No  
U+51E9 GB Extension Yes  
U+5271 GB Extension Yes, and adjust if possible In v1 CN, the right side follows 刃, not 刄. But because of a possible component merger for the 人 component in the left side, restore and adjust the left side to keep JP forms.
Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 19 09 59
U+5292 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+5306   No  
U+54AF   No  
U+54E2   No  
U+5540   No  
U+5556   No  
U+5632   No  
U+56A0 GB Extension Yes Also in issue #374, under the section Missing Glyphs.
U+5738 GB Extension Yes  
U+574F G0, GB 2312 Adjust JP glyph instead See issue #308.
U+57D3   No  
U+57D6   No  
U+583D   No  
U+5870 GB Extension Yes  
U+58EF   No  
U+5918 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 夕 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+591B GB Extension Depends If merging of the 夕 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+594E   No  
U+5962   No  
U+599B GB Extension Yes  
U+5AD0 GB Extension Yes  
U+5B36 GB Extension Yes  
U+5E36   No  
U+5F09 GB Extension Depends This is regarding the feet removal issue at #293. Also see this comment.
U+5F16 GB Extension Yes  
U+5F41 GB Extension Yes  
U+5F99   No  
U+5FDD   No  
U+5FE4   No  
U+5FF1   No  
U+6042   No  
U+606A   No  
U+60F1   No  
U+613C   No  
U+615F   No  
U+625E   No  
U+6289   No  
U+62CC   No  
U+62D4   No  
U+63A3   No  
U+63B5 GB Extension Yes  
U+6500   No  
U+6538   No  
U+655E   No  
U+6746   No  
U+6763 GB Extension Yes  
U+6785   No  
U+67B3   No  
U+67B4   No  
U+67B7   No  
U+67B9   No  
U+67CE   No  
U+68D8   No  
U+69C7   No  
U+69DD GB Extension Yes  
U+6A0C   No  
U+6A2E   No  
U+6A72   No  
U+6AA0 G0, GB 2312 Better to create a new CN glyph instead See issue #426.
U+6AAA   No  
U+6BB1 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 夕 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+6BDF GB Extension Yes  
U+6C5E G0, GB 2312 Adjust JP glyph instead See issue #431.
U+6CAE   No  
U+6D85   No  
U+6E23   No  
U+6EEF   No  
U+6F74   No  
U+70AE   No  
U+70FD   No  
U+718F   No  
U+7199   No  
U+71D4   No  
U+71F9   No  
U+7246   No  
U+7329   No  
U+73CE GB Extension No, create a new CN glyph instead See issue #352. v1 CN glyph shows the two parts as connected. Would likely need a new CN glyph instead based off the JP variant glyph, uni73CEuE0101-JP. Do not modify the JP variant glyph directly as it is required for Adobe-Japan1 support.
Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 19 46 04
U+73DE   No  
U+73F1 GB Extension Yes  
U+7459   No  
U+775A   No  
U+7765   No  
U+78AF   No  
U+79B9   No  
U+7B18 G3 GB/T 13131 (unpublished GB/T 7589-1987 unsimplified forms) No I asked to redesign the JP glyph instead as per issue #408.
Screenshot 2023-06-29 at 00 30 35
U+7B7A GB Extension Yes  
U+7BDD   No  
U+7BE5   No  
U+7BF3   No  
U+7BF6 GB Extension Yes  
U+7CAD GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+7F83   No  
U+7F88 G1, GB 12345 No This is regarding the feet removal issue at #293 and #386.
U+80D6   No  
U+8129   No  
U+813E   No  
U+81A4 GB Extension Yes  
U+838A   No  
U+83B5   No  
U+83BD   No  
U+83EB   No  
U+8420   No  
U+8422   No  
U+84F4   No  
U+8591   No  
U+85CF G0, GB 2312 Yes* In issue #342.
U+8602   No  
U+8655   No  
U+868C   No  
U+870A   No  
U+876E   No  
U+87B3   No  
U+87D2   No  
U+8827   No  
U+8842   No  
U+8CC1   No  
U+8D05   No  
U+8D71 GB Extension Yes Also in issue #374, under the section Missing Glyphs.
U+8DDA   No  
U+8E34   No  
U+8EB1 GB Extension Yes  
U+8EBE GB Extension Yes  
U+8EC6 GB Extension Yes  
U+8F0C GB Extension Yes  
U+8F4C GB Extension Yes  
U+91DB GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+91E1 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+91FC GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+922C GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+933B GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+941A GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+9421 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+945A GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+9587   No  
U+958A GB Extension Yes  
U+95A8   No  
U+95CD   No  
U+968D   No  
U+96B2 GB Extension Yes  
U+9730   No  
U+98AA   No  
U+98C4   No  
U+98DC   No  
U+98EE GB Extension Yes, and adjust If the top left 人 component follows JP forms, restore and adjust glyph.
U+9920 GB Extension Yes, and adjust If the top left 人 component follows JP forms, restore and adjust glyph.
U+99AE   No  
U+99F1   No  
U+99F2   No  
U+9A65   No  
U+9BF1   No  
U+9C04 GB Extension Yes  
U+9CEC   No  
U+9D48   No  
U+9D50   No  
U+9D6F   No  
U+9DA4   No  

JIS Level 3

Unicode Character GB Source Restore v1 CN glyph? Comments
U+34B5   No  
U+37E2   No  
U+4E2F   No  
U+5002 GB Extension Depends Slightly different strokes at the top of the v1 CN glyph. Unsure if this is an issue or not.
Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 22 49 26
U+51DE   No  
U+52C8   No  
U+5307 GB Extension Depends Suggest to use uni5307uE0101-JP instead, if the merging of the 夕 component favours JP forms.
Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 20 28 58
U+5393   No  
U+539D   No  
U+560E   No  
U+57E4   No  
U+5861   No  
U+5C5B GB Extension Yes  
U+5E77 GB Extension Yes  
U+5F45 GB Extension Yes  
U+6451   No  
U+659D   No  
U+665A   No  
U+6678   No  
U+66FB GB Extension Yes  
U+679B GB Extension Depends If merging of the 𠂆 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+6A73 GB Extension Yes  
U+6B1B   No  
U+6C5C   No  
U+6D39   No  
U+704E GB Extension Yes  
U+710F GB Extension Yes  
U+769D   No  
U+76CE   No  
U+76F1   No  
U+784F GB Extension Yes  
U+7A5D GB Extension Yes  
U+7B6D   No  
U+80F3   No  
U+82C6 GB Extension Yes  
U+85AD   No  
U+8612   No  
U+8657 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 𠂆 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+865B   No  
U+8D12   No  
U+91FB GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+9243 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+95DA   No  
U+974E GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+9856   No  
U+9BCE GB Extension Yes  

JIS Level 4

Unicode Character GB Source Restore v1 CN glyph? Comments
U+34C7   No  
U+3B77   No  
U+3DC0   No  
U+4508   No  
U+4D77 G5 GB/T 13132 (unpublished GB/T 7590-1987 unsimplified forms) Yes Minor stroke difference is likely a regional difference. Maybe restore for consistency sake.
Screenshot 2023-06-29 at 00 35 05
U+4E12 GB Extension Yes  
U+4E2E   No  
U+4E40 GB Extension Yes  
U+4E47   No  
U+4E51 GB Extension Probably no This was addressed previously to make the right two strokes consistent between Sans and Serif, but I'm honestly not sure if it breaks PRC glyph conventions and whether they are related to similar characters like 豕. However, being a GB Extension character it might probably not matter. Even the commercial Chinese fonts show that the right part of 乑 is unrelated to that of 豕.
Screenshot 2023-06-29 at 01 44 54
U+4E5A   No  
U+4ED0 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+4FBE GB Extension Depends If merging of the 子 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+5010 GB Extension Yes  
U+51A3 GB Extension Yes  
U+51AD GB Extension Yes  
U+51BC   No  
U+5500 GB Extension Yes  
U+5560 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 𠂆 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+5564   No  
U+56AD   No  
U+56CD   No  
U+57F8   No  
U+5906   No  
U+5B52 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 子 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+5B6F GB Extension Depends If merging of the 子 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+5CC9   No  
U+5E6C   No  
U+5EFD GB Extension Yes, and adjust if possible The restored v1 CN glyph should follow the v2 design of 廴, and no feet on the top right part (also applies to JP glyph as well).
Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 22 57 32
U+5F8F GB Extension Yes  
U+604C   No  
U+6197   No  
U+6215   No  
U+63F7 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 臼 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+674C   No  
U+675D   No  
U+6844   No  
U+6857 GB Extension Yes  
U+6896   No  
U+68BB GB Extension Yes  
U+68CF   No  
U+697F 楿   No  
U+6A30 GB Extension Yes  
U+6A91   No  
U+6BEE GB Extension Yes  
U+6C95   No  
U+6C97 GB Extension Probably no Slightly different strokes at the bottom of the v1 CN glyph, probably not an issue.
Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 22 49 48
U+6E57   No  
U+7047 GB Extension Yes  
U+71AF   No  
U+722B   No  
U+7234 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 𠂆 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+728E   No  
U+72B1 GB Extension Yes  
U+7695   No  
U+76EC   No  
U+77A2   No  
U+77EA GB Extension Yes  
U+7847   No  
U+78E0   No  
U+79C2 GB Extension No, create a new CN glyph instead The v1 CN glyph is only slightly adjusted from JP, but the top part is a throw stroke but it's not supposed to be that due to the 避重捺 (no repeated throw strokes) policy for Chinese handwriting standards. Need a new CN glyph.
Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 23 01 03
U+79C7 GB Extension Yes  
U+7BD6 G3 GB/T 13131 (unpublished GB/T 7589-1987 unsimplified forms) Yes  
U+7C5E   No  
U+7C61 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+7F3C GB Extension Yes  
U+7F63   No  
U+7F64 GB Extension Yes  
U+8451   No  
U+84DC   No  
U+84F0   No  
U+8551   No  
U+867A   No  
U+8731   No  
U+87E6   No  
U+8990 GB Extension Yes  
U+8E22   No  
U+8E6F   No  
U+8EB5 GB Extension Yes  
U+90EB   No  
U+90FF   No  
U+9137 GB Extension Yes  
U+9247 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+9259 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+9268 GB Extension No, create a new CN glyph instead See issue #352. v1 CN glyph shows the two parts as connected. Would likely need a new CN glyph instead based off the JP glyph.
Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 22 59 44
U+929F GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+97F1   No  
U+9825 GB Extension Yes  
U+98AB GB Extension Yes  
U+98B7   No  
U+9D11 GB Extension Yes  
U+9D5F   No  
U+9D62 GB Extension Yes  
U+9F3D   No  

Other Non-JIS Characters

Most of them are part of Adobe-Japan1-6

Unicode Character GB Source Restore v1 CN glyph? Comments
U+3405   No  
U+3427   No  
U+39B3   No Glyph looks the same in v1 and v2
U+3ADA G3 GB/T 13131 (unpublished GB/T 7589-1987 unsimplified forms) No Make a new CN glyph instead as the bottom part is 曰 (with the middle stroke not touching the right box), not 日.
U+3B35   No Still showing CN forms, glyph must be shared with 胶 (U+80F6)
U+3B3A   No Glyph looks the same in v1 and v2
U+3B3B   No Glyph looks the same in v1 and v2
U+3BA3   No Still showing CN forms, was adjusted in v2
U+439B   No Glyph looks the same in v1 and v2
U+4B7E   No  
U+4E41   No  
U+4E74 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 𠂆 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+4E77 GB Extension Yes  
U+4E90 GB Extension Yes  
U+4EFE GB Extension Yes  
U+4F2E GB Extension Yes  
U+4F31 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+4F71 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+4FBD   No  
U+4FE2 GB Extension Yes  
U+5035   No  
U+5071 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 𠂆 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+50C0   No  
U+5128 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 𠂆 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+514F GB Extension Depends If merging of the 𠂆 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+51BF   No  
U+51C2   No  
U+51D2 G5 GB/T 13132 (unpublished GB/T 7590-1987 unsimplified forms) Depends If merging of the 丷 (豆) component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+51F2 GB Extension Yes  
U+5231   No  
U+5266 GB Extension Yes  
U+52B0   No  
U+52B6 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 𠂆 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+52B7 GB Extension Yes  
U+52C4 GB Extension Yes  
U+5303 GB Extension Yes  
U+531B GB Extension Yes  
U+531E GB Extension Yes  
U+5328 GB Extension Yes  
U+5329 GB Extension Yes  
U+5365   No  
U+53E0   No  
U+53E6   No  
U+543F GB Extension Depends JP looks better and the character does not look obvious when seen in small sizes, but Chinese standards dictate that the 牛 must touch the 口, so unsure for now.
Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 23 32 19
U+5444 GB Extension Yes  
U+54F6   No  
U+55E0 GB Extension Yes  
U+560A   No  
U+5619 GB Extension Yes  
U+5620   No  
U+5641   No  
U+56CF   No  
U+58E1 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+58FF   No  
U+5936 GB Extension Yes  
U+5995 GB Extension Yes  
U+5A3F 娿 GB Extension Yes  
U+5A72 GB Extension Yes  
U+5A8D GB Extension Yes  
U+5B5E GB Extension Depends If merging of the 子 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+5B7E GB Extension Yes, and adjust if possible The left 子 radical could be modified to the JP form if the JP forms are preferred for all regions.
U+5BF9 G0, GB 2312 No JP looks better.
U+5C14 G0, GB 2312 Yes See issue #352. Likely the v1 CN glyph will be restored as part of a regional difference. There's nothing I can do to force JP to use CN forms.
Screenshot 2023-06-29 at 00 23 43
U+5C2E GB Extension Yes  
U+5C36 GB Extension Yes  
U+5CB2 GB Extension Yes  
U+5D44 GB Extension Yes  
U+5D83 GB Extension Yes  
U+5DD9 GB Extension Yes  
U+5E32 GB Extension Yes  
U+5F2B GB Extension Yes  
U+5F2C GB Extension Yes  
U+6056   No  
U+60E5 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 臼 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+6102 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 子 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+61A0 GB Extension Yes  
U+636D   No  
U+6371   No  
U+63C5   No  
U+645C   No  
U+64EA   No  
U+654E GB Extension Depends If merging of the 子 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+6598 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 夕 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+65A3   No  
U+65FE GB Extension Yes  
U+661B GB Extension Yes  
U+66E3   No  
U+6707 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+6710   No  
U+67A4   No  
U+67BE   No  
U+67FA   No  
U+682E   No  
U+6858   No  
U+6A37 GB Extension Yes  
U+6B2B GB Extension Yes  
U+6B5A GB Extension Yes  
U+6B7D GB Extension Depends If merging of the 夕 and 斤 components favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+6BAC GB Extension Depends If 歹 favours JP forms, create a new CN glyph by adjusting from the JP glyph. Also, see issue #388.
U+6E42 GB Extension Yes  
U+6E95 GB Extension Yes  
U+6F04   No  
U+7013 GB Extension Yes  
U+7179 GB Extension Yes  
U+7241   No  
U+724E   No  
U+7343   No  
U+7360   No  
U+7527 GB Extension Yes  
U+7575 GB Extension Yes  
U+7682   No  
U+76C1 GB Extension Yes  
U+7773   No  
U+7796 GB Extension Yes  
U+784C   No  
U+7863 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 子 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+7916 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 臼 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+791F   No  
U+7B40   No  
U+7B53 GB Extension Yes  
U+7B6A GB Extension Yes  
U+7BBA GB Extension Yes  
U+7BC8   No  
U+7BFE   No  
U+7CDA GB Extension Yes  
U+7CE9 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 人 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+8009 GB Extension Yes  
U+8013 GB Extension Yes  
U+8040 GB Extension Yes  
U+8060 GB Extension Yes  
U+809E GLK 《龍龕手鑑》(續古逸叢書) Adjust JP variant glyph instead UPDATE 2023-07-30: The JP variant glyph, uni809EuE0101-JP, is much closer to the latest China GB standard, although the right 叉 component is an open loop which may not fully comply with the closed-loop form favoured by the PRC glyph conventions. However, I suggest instead to make an adjustment to the JP variant glyph to reduce the gap in the 叉 component so it will look a bit more compliant.
Screenshot 2023-07-30 at 03 47 55
Also see this comment.Screenshot 2023-07-30 at 03 35 22
Screenshot 2023-07-30 at 03 33 13
U+80F7 GB Extension Yes  
U+8141 GB Extension Yes  
U+8152   No  
U+81CB GB Extension Yes  
U+830A GB Extension Depends If merging of the 𠂆 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+832E   No  
U+8550 GB Extension Yes  
U+8552   No  
U+85B8   No  
U+8642   No  
U+865D GB Extension Yes  
U+8745 GB Extension Yes  
U+87CA   No  
U+87F8 GB Extension Yes  
U+89A8 GB Extension Yes  
U+8C63 GB Extension Yes  
U+8CC9   No  
U+8CEF GB Extension Depends If merging of the 子 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+8D82 GB Extension Yes See issue #352. Likely the v1 CN glyph will be restored as part of a regional difference. There's nothing I can do to force JP to use CN forms.
Screenshot 2023-06-29 at 00 56 49
U+8D9E   No  
U+8DE5 GB Extension Yes  
U+8EC7 GB Extension Yes  
U+8F27   No  
U+90C9 GB Extension Yes  
U+90CC   No  
U+913C GB Extension Yes  
U+921D GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+921F GB Extension Maybe create a new CN glyph instead It would be better to create a new CN glyph by basing it off the JP glyph if the 金 component can be merged to the JP forms.
U+9292 GB Extension Maybe create a new CN glyph instead It would be better to create a new CN glyph by basing it off the JP glyph if the 金 component can be merged to the JP forms.
U+9337 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+936F GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+937F GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+9402 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+941F GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+9459 GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+945C GB Extension Depends If merging of the 金 component favours JP forms, no need to restore.
U+9484 GB Extension Maybe create a new CN glyph instead It would be better to create a new CN glyph by basing it off the JP glyph, because the 柬 part in the bottom right must be a drop stroke (點), not a throw stroke (捺), and that is if the 金 component can be merged to the JP forms.
Screenshot 2023-06-29 at 00 19 35
U+95C9   No  
U+9625   No  
U+9631   No  
U+9674   No  
U+967B   No  
U+967F GB Extension Yes  
U+9775 GB Extension Yes  
U+99F5   No  
U+9A08 GB Extension Yes  
U+9A0B   No  
U+9A51   No  
U+9A56   No  
U+9B94 GB Extension Yes  
U+9BBC GB Extension Yes  
U+9D2F   No  
U+9F0F   No  
U+9F11 GB Extension Yes  
U+9F47   No  
U+9FB4   No  

UPDATE 2023-07-23: The v1 CN glyphs for 妕 (U+5995), 娿 (U+5A3F), 婲 (U+5A72) and 媍 (U+5A8D) must be restored, instead of "should not be restored", because previously I failed to notice the regional difference in the 女 component. Ironically for Serif, the JP glyphs for 娿 (U+5A3F) and 婲 (U+5A72) were mistakenly removed which is required for Korean KSX support.

UPDATE 2023-07-30: Added more info about 肞 (U+809E) which I didn't check properly, so Adobe should not restore the v1 CN glyph, and instead adjust the JP variant glyph, uni809EuE0101-JP, so that it matches the JP glyph of 叉 (U+53C9).
Screenshot 2023-07-30 at 03 47 55

UPDATE 2023-08-03: Changed entry for 圸 (U+5738) to "restore v1 CN glyph" instead of "do not restore v1 CN glyph", missed that one out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant