Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

client: fix upload timeouts with sock_read set (#7150) #7206

Conversation

Dreamsorcerer
Copy link
Member

Prevent the sock_read timeout callback from firing by only scheduling it afterthe payload (if any) has been fully written.

No

Fixes #7149

  • I think the code is well written
  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Documentation reflects the changes
  • If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
    • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
    • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
  • Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES folder
    • name it <issue_id>.<type> for example (588.bugfix)
  • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the pr
    • ensure type is one of the following: * .feature: Signifying a new feature. * .bugfix: Signifying a bug fix. * .doc: Signifying a documentation improvement. * .removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
  • .misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
  • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: "Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files."

Co-authored-by: Sam Bull aa6bs0@sambull.org
(cherry picked from commit fecbe99)

What do these changes do?

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

Related issue number

Checklist

  • I think the code is well written
  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Documentation reflects the changes
  • If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
    • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
    • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
  • Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES folder
    • name it <issue_id>.<type> for example (588.bugfix)
    • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the pr
    • ensure type is one of the following:
      • .feature: Signifying a new feature.
      • .bugfix: Signifying a bug fix.
      • .doc: Signifying a documentation improvement.
      • .removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
      • .misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
    • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: "Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files."

Prevent the `sock_read` timeout callback from firing by only scheduling
it afterthe payload (if any) has been fully written.

No

Fixes #7149

- [x] I think the code is well written
- [x] Unit tests for the changes exist
- [x] Documentation reflects the changes
- [x] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to
`CONTRIBUTORS.txt`
  * The format is &lt;Name&gt; &lt;Surname&gt;.
  * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
- [x] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES` folder
  * name it `<issue_id>.<type>` for example (588.bugfix)
* if you don't have an `issue_id` change it to the pr id after creating
the pr
  * ensure type is one of the following:
    * `.feature`: Signifying a new feature.
    * `.bugfix`: Signifying a bug fix.
    * `.doc`: Signifying a documentation improvement.
    * `.removal`: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
* `.misc`: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
* Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for
example: "Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files."

---------

Co-authored-by: Sam Bull <aa6bs0@sambull.org>
(cherry picked from commit fecbe99)
@psf-chronographer psf-chronographer bot added the bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR label Feb 11, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #7206 (a518b2a) into 3.9 (5998102) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              3.9    #7206   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.35%   97.36%           
=======================================
  Files         107      107           
  Lines       31276    31297   +21     
  Branches     3963     3964    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        30449    30472   +23     
+ Misses        621      620    -1     
+ Partials      206      205    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
CI-GHA 97.25% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
OS-Linux 96.93% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
OS-Windows 94.51% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
OS-macOS 96.49% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.10.9 96.98% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.11.0 95.38% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.7.15 96.73% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.7.9 94.37% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.8.10 94.29% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.8.16 96.63% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.9.13 94.29% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.9.16 96.65% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-pypy7.3.11 94.06% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
VM-macos 96.49% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
VM-ubuntu 96.93% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
VM-windows 94.51% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
aiohttp/client_proto.py 96.64% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
aiohttp/client_reqrep.py 97.82% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
tests/test_client_functional.py 98.48% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
tests/test_client_proto.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
aiohttp/client.py 94.59% <0.00%> (+0.41%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@Dreamsorcerer Dreamsorcerer merged commit e49bfdb into 3.9 Feb 11, 2023
@Dreamsorcerer Dreamsorcerer deleted the patchback/backports/3.9/fecbe999c7a110fbeba8aa6ba269497435b2870d/pr-7150 branch February 11, 2023 17:31
@skshetry
Copy link

@Dreamsorcerer, is there any reason not to backport this in 3.8? We'd love to see this released, as it's breaking chunking uploads of large files for us. Happy to create backport PR. 🙂

@Dreamsorcerer
Copy link
Member Author

Firstly, it changes the behaviour in a significant enough way, that'd I'm not too comfortable including in a bug release (and would like to avoid doing another 3.8 release at this point). Secondly, we'd ideally get a write timeout parameter included before this is released (#7150 (comment)), otherwise there is potential here for a connection to never timeout.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants