Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MNG-8176] Restrict classloader for Maven 4 plugins #1336

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2024

Conversation

gnodet
Copy link
Contributor

@gnodet gnodet commented Dec 7, 2023

No description provided.

@gnodet gnodet marked this pull request as ready for review June 25, 2024 20:31
@gnodet gnodet requested a review from cstamas June 27, 2024 05:29
@gnodet gnodet added this to the 4.0.0-beta-4 milestone Jun 27, 2024
@gnodet gnodet changed the title Restrict classloader for Maven 4 plugins [MNG-8176] Restrict classloader for Maven 4 plugins Jul 6, 2024
@gnodet gnodet modified the milestones: 4.0.0-beta-4, 4.0.0 Jul 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@rmannibucau rmannibucau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would be great to get rid of slf4j but clearly a big step forward

@gnodet
Copy link
Contributor Author

gnodet commented Aug 12, 2024

Would be great to get rid of slf4j but clearly a big step forward

The plan would be to allow some customization by the plugin later, so that they can add/remove packages and fine tune their class loader. In most cases, slf4j is not a problem.

@rmannibucau
Copy link
Contributor

In most cases, slf4j is not a problem.

Well, from my perspective we decided to use maven.api logging api and let the mojo use or not another API/binding/solution so there is no more reason to let slf4j leak (or then we should let leak other stuff too).
Slf4j was not a problem until it became and the choice was to give more guarantees to the mojo writers so default is probably better not having it and use tuning options to let it pass in unsafe mode.

But just my 2 cts indeed.

@gnodet gnodet merged commit 2a709dc into apache:master Aug 12, 2024
13 checks passed
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants