Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MNG-8233] Client should handle modelIds as "opaque" #1701

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cstamas
Copy link
Member

@cstamas cstamas commented Sep 4, 2024

Javadoc states wrong things (about format of modelId, they are paths in reality), but also these all are "implementation details". Crafting modelIds to "walk" lineage is wrong, there is a dedicated method that provide "opaque" key Strings in defined order to do that. And client should not care (nor assume) anything about format of the key String.

As per MNG-8233, "modelIds" in Maven4 are NOT g:a:vs as Javadoc wrongly states, but paths.


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-8233

Javadoc states wrong things (about format of modelId, they are
paths in reality), but also these all are "implementation details".
Crafting modelIds to "walk" lineage is wrong, there is a dedicated
method that provide "opaque" key Strings in defined order to
do that. And client should not care (nor assume) anything
about format of the key String.

---

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-8233
@cstamas cstamas requested a review from gnodet September 4, 2024 11:14
@cstamas cstamas self-assigned this Sep 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@gnodet gnodet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure we should keep them after MNG-8120, but I'm fine with those changes for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants