-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 373
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
support of changes files #71
Comments
@deknos, do you mean files produced by |
Yes, dpkg-genchanges(1). i should have mentioned that, sorry. |
👍 that would be indeed a great addition, a few ideas thinking out loud: basic functionality would include support to process a .changes file I'd say and include in a repo (or a snapshot too perhaps?) whatever files are referenced in the .changes (possibly also checking the checksums?) more advanced functionality can include authenticating (usually via gpg signature) and authorizing (e.g. like reprepro does) users via .changes files so that the usual debian toolchain can be used (debuild, dput, etc) thanks again for aptly! |
I'm trying to understand use case for |
the main advantage I see is being able to use the full debian toolchain to upload packages to aptly, so debuild would generate a .changes file for me, sign it and dput would upload it. So being able to describe a change to an archive, and a way to authenticate and authorize it which isn't necessarily being able to write to the aptly database files. What do you think? |
Sample |
aptly could be configured to use |
The paste is only going to last a week, so I'm repasting the example here
|
Use case for the If the verifications fail, the upload shall be rejected. Due to this lack of uploader authentication/authorization, the |
@oCCtet thanks for the great case! |
I wrote my own script to process |
Eliminate "hint" on missing keys which doesn't apply to .changes. Would be good to eventually stop using GPG and start calling golang.org/x/crypto/openpgp
…e restriction based on .changes file. #71
Done in Documentation: http://beta.aptly.info/doc/aptly/repo/include/ |
Hi, issue #278 reports a issue when including a package to a backports distribution. |
Hi,
we would like to replace our repository-tools with aptly.
It would be nice, if aptly supports changes-files.
We build our own Debian-Packages and we include them into dak and reprepro-repositories. Since changes-files include a list of source- and deb-Packages, it is easier to import own packages with that file, since automatically both types are included into our repository.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: