IPv6 SocketUDT

[aurelienmaury]

The com.barchart.udt.SocketUDT class states clearly:

note: current implementation supports IPv4 only (no IPv6)

Is there any hope to see a IPv6 ready SocketUDT in a future release ?

Btw, thanks for this great piece of work, I play with the Netty integration and take a lot of fun.

[Andrei-Pozolotin]

thanks for checking in.
adding ipv6 support is a straightforward change, but it touches on many places.
there were no need to support ipv6 internally here, and there were no one else interested.
you are the first one :-) I could definitely help, but someone like you would have to take the lead.
you would want to fork a branch and start breaking/fixing relevant unit tests affected by new ipv6 support.
cheers!

[aurelienmaury]

Nice hook ;-)

I add this to my TODO list. If you have hints to give me, about where to start and pitfalls, it'd be nice.

[Andrei-Pozolotin]

:-)
to give you any hints I have to make context switch myself. :-)
lets make a deal: when you feel like really doing it I will be there also.

[Holdo]

So... what's up? :)
I guess I'll pick this up then because... wait for it... I preferIPv6Addresses

[dlucek]

Michael:
IP v 6 support would be great.

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Michal Holič notifications@github.com
wrote:

So... what's up? :)
I guess I'll pick this up then because... wait for it... I
preferIPv6Addresses

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#58 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAd-va2PbtjbXyH5YzYM93CK3xA84ZHfks5qoTVZgaJpZM4BDlya
.

dl

[Holdo]

Should be done #86