Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(consensus-types): add more unit tests for ExecutableDataDeneb #1568

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

minhngoc274
Copy link

@minhngoc274 minhngoc274 commented Jun 22, 2024

Partially address #1190

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Enhanced initialization and handling of transactions and withdrawals in test cases.
    • Updated size validation logic for executable data.
    • Added comprehensive error handling tests for serialization, deserialization, and hash tree root calculations.
    • Improved validation of fields for transactions and withdrawals.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 22, 2024

Walkthrough

This update makes significant improvements to the payload_test.go file, focusing on the initialization and handling of executable data, particularly transactions and withdrawals. Enhancements include setting initial values for transactions and withdrawals, adjusting size evaluations, implementing robust error handling for invalid data serialization and deserialization, and validating various fields for accuracy.

Changes

File Summary
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_test.go Improved initialization of transactions and withdrawals; updated size computations from 528 to 576; added robust error handling and validation checks for serialization/deserialization and JSON/SSZ marshalling.

Sequence Diagram(s)

The changes are too varied and evenly distributed across multiple test functions to generate a coherent sequence diagram that adds meaningful insight.

Poem

In code we trust, the tests must run,

With transactions set, and errors none.

Data initialized, for values true,

Size and checks are now brand new.

The robust marshall, and JSON clear,

Deneb's tests we hold so dear. 🌟📜


Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI gpt-4o model for code reviews and chat: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.
  • OSS projects are always opted into early access features.
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b0940f2 and bf4b292.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_test.go (7 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_test.go (5)

Line range hint 38-62: Initialization of transactions and withdrawals in generateExecutableDataDeneb function.

The addition of initialization for transactions and withdrawals ensures that these fields are not nil, which can prevent potential nil pointer dereferences during operations involving these fields. This is a significant improvement in terms of robustness and stability of the code.


84-88: Updated size calculation and added error handling in TestExecutableDataDeneb_SizeSSZ.

The update from 528 to 576 bytes in the expected size reflects the changes in the underlying data structure, which is a necessary update. Additionally, the introduction of error handling for the deserialization process is a good practice, ensuring that any errors during this operation are properly caught and reported.


Line range hint 106-129: Enhanced assertions in TestExecutableDataDeneb_Getters.

The addition of initialization for transactions and withdrawals directly in the test function, followed by assertions to check their lengths, enhances the test's ability to verify the correctness of the getters. This change improves the test coverage and reliability of the getters' functionality.


320-375: Comprehensive testing for error cases in TestExecutableDataDeneb_Marshal_Error.

The tests added for various error conditions during the marshalling process are well-structured and cover a range of potential issues, such as invalid sizes for LogsBloom, ExtraData, Transactions, and Withdrawals. These tests are crucial for ensuring the robustness of the serialization process and help in catching serialization errors early.


377-431: Comprehensive testing for error cases in TestExecutableDataDeneb_HasTreeRootWith_Error.

Similar to the marshalling tests, these tests for the hash tree root calculation process are thorough and cover various invalid scenarios that could occur due to incorrect data sizes. This is an excellent practice for ensuring the integrity and correctness of the hash tree root calculations.

@minhngoc274 minhngoc274 force-pushed the minhngoc274/executable-data-deneb-uts branch from bf4b292 to 8847173 Compare June 22, 2024 20:26
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bf4b292 and 8847173.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_test.go (7 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_test.go (5)

84-88: Updated size comparison and added error handling.

The update to the size comparison in the SSZ serialization test is noted. It would be beneficial to include a comment explaining why the size has changed from 528 to 576. The addition of error handling for invalid data is a good practice.


Line range hint 106-129: Proper use of initialized fields in getter tests.

The test function initializes transactions and withdrawals and updates assertions to reflect these. This ensures that the getter methods are tested against known values, enhancing test reliability.


320-375: Comprehensive error testing in marshaling.

The addition of detailed error scenarios for the marshaling process is commendable. It covers various potential issues, ensuring robust error handling in the serialization code.


377-431: Thorough error testing for hash tree root calculations.

The structured approach to testing error scenarios in the hash tree root calculations mirrors the robustness seen in the marshaling tests. This consistency in testing error handling across different functionalities is excellent.


Line range hint 38-62: Initialization of test data looks good.

The initialization of transactions and withdrawals is correctly implemented. Ensure that these fields are consistently used in all relevant test cases.

Verification successful

Initialization of transactions and withdrawals is correctly implemented and consistently used in tests.

The test cases in payload_test.go correctly utilize the initialized transactions and withdrawals fields, verifying their values through assertions.

  • require.Equal(t, transactions, payload.GetTransactions())
  • require.Equal(t, withdrawals, payload.GetWithdrawals())
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all test cases that should use initialized `transactions` and `withdrawals`.

# Test: Search for test cases using these fields.
rg --type go 'transactions|withdrawals' ./mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_test.go

Length of output: 790

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8847173 and 4aadc0c.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_test.go (7 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_test.go (6)

Line range hint 39-63: Proper initialization of transactions and withdrawals.

The initialization of transactions and withdrawals in generateExecutableDataDeneb is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives to enhance test coverage.


85-89: Updated size and added error handling.

The update in the expected size from 528 to 576 is appropriate given the additions to the data structure. Additionally, the introduction of error handling for invalid data during deserialization enhances robustness.


Line range hint 107-130: Updated getter tests with new initializations and assertions.

The updates to the TestExecutableDataDeneb_Getters function, including the initialization of transactions and withdrawals and the updated assertions, are correctly implemented and improve the comprehensiveness of the tests.


322-322: Added comprehensive error scenarios for JSON unmarshalling.

The addition of detailed error scenarios in TestExecutableDataDeneb_UnmarshalJSON_Error significantly enhances the test's ability to verify robust error handling.


323-378: Added comprehensive error scenarios for SSZ marshalling.

The addition of detailed error scenarios in TestExecutableDataDeneb_Marshal_Error significantly enhances the test's ability to verify robust error handling during marshalling.


380-434: Added comprehensive error scenarios for hash tree root calculations.

The addition of detailed error scenarios in TestExecutableDataDeneb_HasTreeRootWith_Error significantly enhances the test's ability to verify robust error handling during hash tree root calculations.

@itsdevbear itsdevbear enabled auto-merge (squash) June 28, 2024 02:36
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4aadc0c and 0dd851c.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_test.go (7 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_test.go (5)

Line range hint 39-63: Initialization of transactions and withdrawals looks correct.

This setup is essential for ensuring that the ExecutableDataDeneb struct is properly initialized with transactions and withdrawals for further testing.


85-89: Updated size assertion and error handling are appropriate.

The size update from 528 to 576 reflects changes in the data structure, and the addition of error handling for invalid data during deserialization enhances the test's robustness.


129-130: New assertions for transactions and withdrawals are correctly implemented.

The assertions ensure that the getters for transactions and withdrawals are functioning as expected, which is crucial for the integrity of the data structure.


323-378: Comprehensive error handling in marshalling tests is well-implemented.

The variety of test cases covering different error scenarios during marshalling ensures that the serialization process is robust and can handle edge cases effectively.


380-434: Error handling in hash tree root calculation tests is thorough.

The test cases effectively cover potential error scenarios during the hash tree root calculation, which is important for the integrity of the data structure.

auto-merge was automatically disabled June 28, 2024 04:25

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0dd851c and 64d4f0d.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_test.go (6 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_test.go (6)

39-47: Approved: Proper initialization of transactions and withdrawals.

The arrays are initialized correctly and set to their default values effectively. This change aligns with the PR's goal of enhancing test coverage and initialization correctness.


62-63: Approved: Correct assignment of initialized arrays to the struct.

The transactions and withdrawals arrays are correctly assigned to the ExecutableDataDeneb struct, ensuring that the object is fully initialized when returned.


85-85: Approved: Updated size assertion and added error handling.

The update in the expected size from 528 to 576 is correctly reflected in the test. Additionally, the introduction of error handling for invalid data during deserialization is a good practice, enhancing the robustness of the test.

Also applies to: 87-89


107-115: Approved: Enhanced assertions in getters.

The test now includes assertions for transactions and withdrawals, ensuring that the getters are functioning correctly. This aligns with the PR's objective to enhance the robustness and coverage of unit tests.

Also applies to: 129-130


323-385: Approved: Comprehensive error handling in marshalling tests.

The test cases cover a wide range of error scenarios, including invalid sizes and null values. This ensures that the marshalling process is robust against various types of input errors.


387-441: Approved: Robust error handling in hash tree root calculation.

The test cases effectively cover various error scenarios that could occur during the hash tree root calculation, ensuring that the function behaves correctly under erroneous conditions.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64d4f0d and c8b75d3.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_test.go (6 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (15)
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_test.go (15)

39-47: Initialization of transactions and withdrawals

The initialization of transactions and withdrawals arrays ensures that the ExecutableDataDeneb struct is correctly populated with default values. This change is consistent with the improvements mentioned in the PR summary.


Line range hint 49-57: Serialization Test

The test for SSZ serialization and deserialization ensures that the ExecutableDataDeneb struct can be correctly serialized and deserialized without errors. It also verifies that the original and deserialized objects are equal.


85-89: Size Calculation and Error Handling

The size comparison value has been updated to 576, reflecting changes in the data structure. Additionally, error handling for invalid data during SSZ deserialization ensures robustness.


Line range hint 91-94: Hash Tree Root Calculation Test

The test for hash tree root calculation ensures that the ExecutableDataDeneb struct can correctly calculate the hash tree root without errors.


Line range hint 96-100: Tree Generation Test

The test for tree generation ensures that the ExecutableDataDeneb struct can correctly generate a tree without errors and that the result is not nil.


107-115: Getters Test and Initialization of transactions and withdrawals

The test for getters ensures that the ExecutableDataDeneb struct returns the expected values. The initialization of transactions and withdrawals arrays is consistent with the changes mentioned in the PR summary.

Also applies to: 129-130


Line range hint 132-140: JSON Marshaling Test

The test for JSON marshaling and unmarshaling ensures that the ExecutableDataDeneb struct can be correctly marshaled to and unmarshaled from JSON without errors. It also verifies that the original and unmarshaled objects are equal.


Line range hint 142-148: IsNil Method Test

The test for the IsNil method ensures that the ExecutableDataDeneb struct correctly identifies nil and non-nil instances.


Line range hint 150-153: IsBlinded Method Test

The test for the IsBlinded method ensures that the ExecutableDataDeneb struct correctly identifies non-blinded instances.


Line range hint 155-158: Version Method Test

The test for the Version method ensures that the ExecutableDataDeneb struct returns the expected version.


Line range hint 160-165: Empty Method Test

The test for the Empty method ensures that the ExecutionPayload struct returns a non-nil instance with the expected version.


Line range hint 167-189: ToHeader Method Test

The test for the ToHeader method ensures that the ExecutionPayload struct correctly converts to a header and that the field values are correctly transferred.


Line range hint 293-320: JSON Unmarshaling Error Test

The test for JSON unmarshaling error cases ensures that the ExecutableDataDeneb struct produces the expected errors when required fields are missing during JSON unmarshaling.


323-384: SSZ Marshaling Error Test

The test for SSZ marshaling error cases ensures that the ExecutableDataDeneb struct produces the expected errors when invalid data is encountered during SSZ marshaling.


387-439: Hash Tree Root Calculation Error Test

The test for hash tree root calculation error cases ensures that the ExecutableDataDeneb struct produces the expected errors when invalid data is encountered during hash tree root calculation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants