Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve dispute validation #6404

Merged

Conversation

HenrikJannsen
Copy link
Collaborator

Contains more validation for dispute data and further preparations for bisq-network/proposals#390 implementation

Signed-off-by: HenrikJannsen <boilingfrog@gmx.com>
Signed-off-by: HenrikJannsen <boilingfrog@gmx.com>
…efundManager

Signed-off-by: HenrikJannsen <boilingfrog@gmx.com>
Signed-off-by: HenrikJannsen <boilingfrog@gmx.com>
We verify later the contract hash in disputes and that would fail otherwise.
…deAddress methods

Signed-off-by: HenrikJannsen <boilingfrog@gmx.com>
It is allowed that there are change outputs, for instance if taker
does not take full trade amount, there is a change output for maker.

Signed-off-by: HenrikJannsen <boilingfrog@gmx.com>
It is allowed that there are change outputs, for instance if taker
does not take full trade amount, there is a change output for maker.

Signed-off-by: HenrikJannsen <boilingfrog@gmx.com>
Signed-off-by: HenrikJannsen <boilingfrog@gmx.com>
Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK

@HenrikJannsen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@sqrrm Would you be available for a review as well?

@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

@sqrrm ☝️

Copy link
Contributor

@alejandrogarcia83 alejandrogarcia83 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@alejandrogarcia83 alejandrogarcia83 merged commit 80a927a into bisq-network:master Nov 25, 2022
@HenrikJannsen HenrikJannsen deleted the improve-dispute-validation branch November 25, 2022 21:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants