Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

For Cycle 22 #793

Closed
stejbac opened this issue Mar 1, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

For Cycle 22 #793

stejbac opened this issue Mar 1, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
@ripcurlx
Labels
parsed:valid https://bisq.wiki/Compensation#Ensure_your_request_is_valid team:dev https://bisq.wiki/Dev_Team was:accepted Indicates that a compensation request was accepted by DAO voting
Milestone
Cycle 22

Comments

@stejbac
Copy link

stejbac commented Mar 1, 2021

Summary

Specify the total amount of BSQ you are requesting, along with the USD total and BSQ/USD rate (don't include the brackets!):

  • BSQ requested: 289.26
  • USD requested: 350
  • BSQ rate: 1.21 USD per BSQ
  • Previous compensation request (if applicable): For Cycle 21 #774

Contributions delivered

Add contributions you have delivered and roles you have performed here as new rows in the table below. Role line-items should include an asterisk (*) in the team column.

Title Team USD Link Notes
Speed up deposit and transactions view loads dev 250 bisq-network/bisq#5120
Fix stale trade statistics list view when new entries arrive dev 100 bisq-network/bisq#5122

Contributions in progress

Provide links to work you're involved with that is still in progress. This section is optional (the linter ignores it), and is for your own benefit in keeping track of what you're doing and keeping other contributors up to date with the same.

Title Team USD Link Notes
Implement Segwit for BSQ dev bisq-network/bisq#5000 Reviewed, tested & ready to merge - just need to decide final fork activation height
Wallet changes for Segwit BSQ implementation dev bisq-network/bisq#5109 Reviewed & tested - can be merged after fork activation

I also created a proposal bisq-network/proposals#312 describing a couple of ideas for implementing an off-chain trading protocol using Lightning. I'm currently looking further into the second idea in the proposal, which uses a third party escrow and garbled circuits (with the latter needed to minimise trust in the escrow and make it non-custodial). I'm attempting to try out the intended Lightning operations, to see if they actually work, by talking to LND over gRPC using a simple test program.
@ghost ghost added parsed:valid https://bisq.wiki/Compensation#Ensure_your_request_is_valid team:dev https://bisq.wiki/Dev_Team labels Mar 1, 2021
@MwithM MwithM added this to the Cycle 22 milestone Mar 1, 2021
@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

ripcurlx commented Mar 3, 2021

As always you undervalue your valuable contributions @stejbac! As team lead I approve this request for dev.

@stejbac
Copy link
Author

stejbac commented Mar 6, 2021

Tx ID: 8e279ce7ba7d569df29d6e8f0d35f7b49a0e307daa0f899623ea6b5b47eaa6de

@MwithM MwithM added the was:accepted Indicates that a compensation request was accepted by DAO voting label Mar 15, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 15, 2021

Issuance by Team:

team amount BSQ amount USD
dev 289.26 350.00

Total Issuance: 289.26 BSQ (equivalent to: 350.00 USD)

@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Mar 15, 2021

Closed as accepted.

@MwithM MwithM closed this as completed Mar 15, 2021
@stejbac stejbac mentioned this issue Dec 20, 2021
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ripcurlx ripcurlx

Labels
parsed:valid https://bisq.wiki/Compensation#Ensure_your_request_is_valid team:dev https://bisq.wiki/Dev_Team was:accepted Indicates that a compensation request was accepted by DAO voting
Projects
Compensation Request Board
Archived in project
Milestone
Cycle 22
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@ripcurlx @MwithM @stejbac