code review #478
Merged
code review #478
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ccoVeille
commented
Jun 10, 2024
|
Annoyingly there is a conflict. If you want to update ill be happy to merge once its resolved. |
|
Sure |
|
The conflicts were due to me fixing typos in #477 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
chore: remove unused parameters
chore: fix Go comments
chore: use simpler syntax
chore: remove useless method
chore: avoid type juggling
chore: reduce complexity
I used golangci with a lot of settings to detect many of the issues I report here