Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch Google Cloud SDK from DockerHub to GCR BA-4640 #5200

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2019
Merged

Conversation

kshakir
Copy link
Contributor

@kshakir kshakir commented Sep 27, 2019

No description provided.

The Docker image for the Google Cloud SDK was previously only [published on Docker
Hub](https://hub.docker.com/r/google/cloud-sdk). Now that the image is [publicly hosted in
GCR](http://gcr.io/google.com/cloudsdktool/cloud-sdk), Papi V2 jobs will localize inputs and delocalize outputs using
the GCR image.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the benefit of using the image from GCR v/s Dockerhub?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a continuation of the Papi networking (VPC / NAT / private IP) work. Not using Docker Hub means Cromwell doesn't need any resources outside of Google Cloud, so now a workflow can use things like private IP address and still localize files. Using private IPs allows one to run more machines, as it won't trip over a public ip address quotas-- or even limits in availability. NOTE: NAT was a workaround for keeping public ip address numbers down too, but I don't know the status of Cromwell/Workbench implementing that feature.

I don't know if this 100% fixes networking features for Papi V2 in Cromwell/Workbench, but it's a huge step.

@kshakir kshakir merged commit 2304986 into develop Sep 27, 2019
@kshakir kshakir deleted the ks_gcloud_gcr branch September 27, 2019 21:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants