Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Doc - Ngeo support filter on single layers only #5084

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 26, 2019
Merged

Conversation

ger-benjamin
Copy link
Member

@sbrunner I target branch 2.2, but there is no more milestone. Is my PR okay ?
Also is this notes correct to you (I wanted to clarify that it's a current limitation of ngeo)

@ger-benjamin ger-benjamin self-assigned this Jun 26, 2019
@@ -43,6 +43,10 @@ If you wish to provide the filter functionality, proceed as follows:
functionalities that all registered users shall have access to, via the
``functionalities.registered`` variable of your vars file.

.. note::

Ngeo offer the filter functionnality only for singles layers and not for grouped layers.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ngeo offers the filter functionality only for single layers, not for grouped layers.

Copy link
Member

@sbrunner sbrunner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be on 2.4 ...

@ger-benjamin ger-benjamin changed the base branch from master to 2.3 June 26, 2019 08:20
@ger-benjamin
Copy link
Member Author

I target branch 2.3 now (not anymore master)
What about tests that fails ?

@ger-benjamin ger-benjamin merged commit 4335504 into 2.3 Jun 26, 2019
@ger-benjamin ger-benjamin deleted the filter_group_doc branch June 26, 2019 10:24
@sbrunner sbrunner added this to the 2.3 milestone Jul 1, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants