Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[cms-common] Always use SCRAM V2 for slc6 #9375

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 22, 2024

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar for branch IB/CMSSW_14_1_X/master.

@aandvalenzuela, @iarspider, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 22, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #9375 was updated.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

+externals

Merging it as jenkins is busy and tests will take hours to finish. I have tested it locally and now scram V2 is used for slc6

  • slc6, rhel6:
> singularity exec -i -B /cvmfs /cvmfs/singularity.opensciencegrid.org/cmssw/cms:rhel6-itb-x86_64 bash
Apptainer> source w/cmsset_default.sh 
Apptainer> scram v
V2_2_9_pre22
  • slc7, rhel7:
> singularity exec -i -B /cvmfs /cvmfs/singularity.opensciencegrid.org/cmssw/cms:rhel7-itb-x86_64 bash
Apptainer> source w/cmsset_default.sh 
Apptainer> scram v
V3_00_75
  • rhel8, el8:
> singularity exec -i -B /cvmfs /cvmfs/singularity.opensciencegrid.org/cmssw/cms:rhel8-itb-x86_64 bash
Apptainer> source w/cmsset_default.sh 
Apptainer> scram v
V3_00_75

@smuzaffar smuzaffar merged commit 8d03c22 into IB/CMSSW_14_1_X/master Aug 22, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_14_1_X/master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants