[RFC] Proposal to merge the Patatrack development into CMSSW 10.5.x #25353
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…filldescriptions_102x Make L1T object comparison fillDescriptions compatible with ConfDB parsing - 102x
Major updates to L3 Muon OI SeedGenerator for high efficiency ( Backport PR for cms-sw#24267 )
Trigger Object Tag and Probe DQM source : 102X
…change Changed CSC binary examiner mask to enable ALCT CRC checks - CMSSW_10_2_X
STEAM : (re)enable HLTDQM in the main sequence [backport cms-sw#24155]
…g2018_10_2_1 PPS Timing Diamond: DQM update; backport of cms-sw#24213
…dress_fix EMTF fix track address for low-quality tracks, back-port to 10_2_1
Run2-alca137 Change the code for IsoTrkFilter
…_pfjets_fix_102x Fix invalid PF jet collection for L1T offline jets and sums DQM - 102x
…qtests_102x L1T DQM - Add uGT board comparison quality tests - 102x
…test HCALDQM: Add quality test for LED misfires (10_2_X)
[10.2.X][Update GTs] new JEC MC TAGs + 2D Pixel Templates
VBF & HWJ gridpack patch
10_2_X backport of PF HEM mitigation
…ast IOV's payload; make PROMPT pixel quality plot the same as PERMANENT BAD plot when the whole run is low statistics
Make the message from the CUDAService more descriptive,and add a test file to run the CUDAService.
Implement the ability to get, serialise, deserialise and put in the Event an arbitrary collection, handling it as an opaque type via its edm::Wrapper<T>.
…tripCalSmallBiasScan.
Backport of cms-sw#24379 to 10_2_X, missing EGM ID modules for DQM
Make unit tests that require a CUDA device skip the test and exit succesfully if the CUDA runtime is not available, or no CUDA devices are available.
cmsbuild
added
code-checks-pending
comparison-pending
tests-pending
and removed
code-checks-approved
comparison-notrun
tests-rejected
labels
|
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
|
@cmsbuild please test |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25353/8059
|
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
|
Pull request #25353 was updated. @andrius-k, @lveldere, @schneiml, @ianna, @kpedro88, @pohsun, @perrotta, @civanch, @zhenhu, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @cvuosalo, @ssekmen, @mdhildreth, @jfernan2, @tocheng, @slava77, @ggovi, @fabiocos, @prebello, @kmaeshima, @pgunnell, @franzoni, @lpernie can you please check and sign again. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
2 similar comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
1 similar comment
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
cmsbuild
added
comparison-notrun
tests-rejected
and removed
comparison-pending
tests-started
labels
|
Please check #25647 instead. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note that the development of the Patatrack branch dates back at least to 10.1.x. Hopefully our development branch has been kept enough in sync with the master branch to avoid big conflicts.
Currently, not all the developments we would like to integrate have been merged in the development branch: see cms-patatrack#200 for the status of the Patatrack branch with respect to readiness for merging upstream.