Remove TestBPHSpecificDecay test

[tvami]

PR description:

This PR removes a test file since it's giving issues in UBSAN + it's actually tested in DQM, i.e. it's a dupplicate.
See more in #45410

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

No backport needed

Resolves #45410

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[tvami]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45709/41348

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @tvami for master.

It involves the following packages:

• HeavyFlavorAnalysis/SpecificDecay (analysis)

@tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[cmsbuild]

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2f20a1/40946/summary.html
COMMIT: e5670a4
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-08-15-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/45709/40946/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 93 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 45
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3422510
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2469
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3420021
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 44 files compared)
• Checked 196 log files, 165 edm output root files, 45 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[mmusich]

@elusian @ronchese FYI

[tvami]

@elusian @ronchese FYI

I'll give folks a few days to raise objection before signing.

[elusian]

I'm mostly a user for this code, I'll leave @ronchese to comment here.
Just to understand, is BPHWriteSpecificDecay itself (and thus the DQM sequence) affected?

[tvami]

is BPHWriteSpecificDecay itself (and thus the DQM sequence) affected?

no that seems to be fine, and that's why I'm only removing the test

[tvami]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[mandrenguyen]

+1