[14_0_X] Backport of 44970 and 45820 (ScoutingNano event content changes for 2024 and T0 scenario for HLTSCOUT datatier) #45950

patinkaew · 2024-09-08T07:41:36Z

PR description:

Backport to 14_0_X of

Add ScoutingMuonNoVtx and ScoutingMuonVtx in Run3Scouting Nano starting from 2024 data taking #44970
Change ScoutingNano event content #45820
to actual data-taking release (14_0_X) to allow T0 production tests with 14_0_X and actual T0 production if tests succeed.

Details:

Change ScoutingNano event content from #45820 since the changes to add ScoutingMuonNoVtx and ScoutingMuonVtx from #44970 are also propagated to #45820.
Add run3_scouting_nanoAOD_post2023 to Era_Run3_2024.
Add T0 processing scenarios for processing HLTSCOUT datatier as inputhltScouting, hltScoutingEra_Run3_2024 from #44970.
Add hltScoutingEra_Run3_2024 scenario to unit test run_CfgTest_8.sh and add new unit test run_CfgTest_13.sh specific for hltScouting scenarios from #44970.
Add workflow 2500.6 to relval_nano. Since #45419 won't be backported to 14_0_X, only necessary information for workflow ScoutingNANOdata140Xrun3 is added. The input file and lumisection range are the same as in #45419. The names are the same as in #45419 for NANO_data14.0, ScoutingPFRun32024RAW14.0, ScoutingNANOdata140Xrun3, except NANO_dataRun3ScoutingPF14.0 which corresponds to scoutingNANO_data14.0 in #45419. This is to keep a convention used in 14_0_X release.

Event size is measured with relval_nano matrix. These are default ScoutingNano with only scouting objects and without standard offline objects and without gen info (for mc).

0.88 kB/event (2500.5 ScoutingNANOdata13X)
2.07 kB/event (2500.51 ScoutingNANOmc13X)
1.14 kB/event (2500.6 ScoutingNANOdata140Xrun3)

Workflow 2500.5 is similar to 2500.131 and 2500.6 is similar to 2500.237 after #45419, so measured event sizes are the same. 2500.51 uses TTBarMINIAOD13.3 while 2500.227 after #45419 uses TTbarMINIAOD14.0, so measured event sizes are slightly different.

Size reports (root files used and size report html files) can be found in 09.07.2024_ScoutingNano_size_reports.

Note: another related PR is #45949 which is a backport of #45820 to 14_1_X to ensure that the event content changes are consistent in subsequent releases across 14_0_X, 14_1_X, and 14_2_X.

PR validation:

Pass all standard unit tests from scram b runtests when running on el8_amd64_gcc12:

Pass    2s ... Configuration/DataProcessing/TestConfigDP_1
Pass   10s ... Configuration/DataProcessing/TestConfigDP_10
Pass   11s ... Configuration/DataProcessing/TestConfigDP_11
Pass  129s ... Configuration/DataProcessing/TestConfigDP_12
Pass    1s ... Configuration/DataProcessing/TestConfigDP_13
Pass  115s ... Configuration/DataProcessing/TestConfigDP_2
Pass   22s ... Configuration/DataProcessing/TestConfigDP_3
Pass   27s ... Configuration/DataProcessing/TestConfigDP_4
Pass  245s ... Configuration/DataProcessing/TestConfigDP_5
Pass   85s ... Configuration/DataProcessing/TestConfigDP_6
Pass  140s ... Configuration/DataProcessing/TestConfigDP_7
Pass  371s ... Configuration/DataProcessing/TestConfigDP_8
Pass   10s ... Configuration/DataProcessing/TestConfigDP_9
Pass    2s ... Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/test-das-selected-lumis
Pass  242s ... Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/test-runTheMatrix-interactive
Pass  268s ... Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/test_MC_22_crosscheck
Pass  218s ... Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/test_MC_22_setup
Pass  293s ... Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/test_MC_23_crosscheck
Pass  328s ... Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/test_MC_23_setup

when running on el9_amd64_gcc12, pass all unit tests from scram b runtests except:

Fail  209s ... Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/test_MC_23_setup

This unit test failure on el9_amd64_gcc12 seems to relate to #45614.

Next following tests are all done on el8_amd64_gcc12.

Pass all tests from runTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos

47 46 45 36 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 tests passed, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 failed

Other tests:

RunPromptReco.py example. The outputs look reasonable:

python3 Configuration/DataProcessing/test/RunPromptReco.py --scenario=hltScoutingEra_Run3_2024 \
--global-tag=140X_dataRun3_Prompt_v4 --nanoaod --nanoFlavours=@Scout --lfn=fileIN.root

python3 Configuration/DataProcessing/test/RunPromptReco.py --scenario=hltScoutingEra_Run3_2024 \
--global-tag=140X_dataRun3_Prompt_v4 --nanoaod --miniaod --nanoFlavours=@Scout --lfn=fileIN.root

runTheMatrix.py --ibeos -l 2500.6 (added ScoutingNano workflow) passes and the output nano file looks reasonable
cmsDriver.py example. The output looks reasonable:

cmsDriver.py step2 -s NANO:@Scout --process NANO \
--data --eventcontent NANOAOD --datatier NANOAOD -n 1000 \
--era Run3_2024 --conditions 140X_dataRun3_Prompt_v4 --filein fileIN.root

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Original PRs are #44970 and #45820. This is a backport to 14_0_X.

FYI: @elfontan @silviodonato

…2024

…MuonVtx for Run3_2024, drop scouting PF candidates, drop scouting tracks, add scouting PF jets (clustered at HLT), remove remove tasks related to TrigObj table, change _lambda to lambda_ for ScoutingTrack, change branch names and docs for jets to clarity, fix typo particlenet_uds to particleNet_uds, fix incorrect orders of particleNet branches in reclustered AK8 jets

…os with HLTSCOUT datatier as input

…ly for hltScouting scenario in run_CfgTest_13.sh and add it to BuildFile.xml

cmsbuild · 2024-09-08T07:42:04Z

A new Pull Request was created by @patinkaew for CMSSW_14_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/DataProcessing (operations)
Configuration/Eras (operations)
Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)
PhysicsTools/NanoAOD (xpog)

@AdrianoDee, @antoniovilela, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftorrresd, @hqucms, @kskovpen, @mandrenguyen, @miquork, @rappoccio, @srimanob, @subirsarkar, @sunilUIET can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@AnnikaStein, @Martin-Grunewald, @fabiocos, @gpetruc, @makortel, @missirol, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

Backported from Add ScoutingMuonNoVtx and ScoutingMuonVtx in Run3Scouting Nano starting from 2024 data taking #44970

cmsbuild · 2024-09-08T07:42:04Z

cms-bot internal usage

hqucms · 2024-09-09T08:00:27Z

enable nano

hqucms · 2024-09-09T08:00:31Z

please test

cmsbuild · 2024-09-09T10:53:53Z

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Size: This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1d01f9/41402/summary.html
COMMIT: d6cebf1
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2024-09-08-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
Additional Tests: NANO
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/45950/41402/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Unit Tests

I found 1 errors in the following unit tests:

---> test TestConfigDP_13 had ERRORS

Comparison Summary

Summary:

You potentially removed 95 lines from the logs
Reco comparison results: 57 differences found in the comparisons
DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3346637
DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1215
DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3345402
DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
Checked 202 log files, 165 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
TriggerResults: no differences found

NANO Comparison Summary

Summary:

You potentially removed 8 lines from the logs
Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 15
DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 17023
DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 17023
DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 14 files compared)
Checked 48 log files, 29 edm output root files, 15 DQM output files

Nano size comparison Summary:

Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.6-size.json
Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.6-size.json
| Sample | kb/ev | ref kb/ev | diff kb/ev | ev/s/thd | ref ev/s/thd | diff rate | mem/thd | ref mem/thd |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2500.0 | 2.783 | 2.783 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 4.01 | 3.97 | +1.0% | 2.246 | 2.247 |
| 2500.001 | 2.897 | 2.897 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 3.58 | 3.54 | +1.1% | 2.680 | 2.680 |
| 2500.002 | 2.843 | 2.843 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 3.71 | 3.71 | +0.0% | 2.591 | 2.662 |
| 2500.01 | 1.446 | 1.446 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 6.90 | 6.94 | -0.6% | 2.300 | 2.367 |
| 2500.011 | 1.906 | 1.906 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 3.73 | 3.68 | +1.2% | 2.425 | 2.553 |
| 2500.012 | 1.761 | 1.761 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 5.40 | 5.45 | -1.0% | 2.411 | 2.473 |
| 2500.1 | 2.354 | 2.354 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 5.20 | 5.15 | +1.1% | 2.080 | 2.081 |
| 2500.2 | 2.459 | 2.459 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 5.99 | 5.88 | +1.9% | 1.989 | 1.997 |
| 2500.21 | 1.286 | 1.286 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 4.23 | 4.20 | +0.6% | 2.286 | 2.299 |
| 2500.211 | 1.668 | 1.668 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 3.88 | 3.82 | +1.6% | 2.362 | 2.370 |
| 2500.3 | 2.229 | 2.229 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 12.39 | 11.78 | +5.3% | 1.982 | 1.980 |
| 2500.301 | 2.833 | 2.833 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 10.81 | 10.35 | +4.5% | 1.960 | 1.967 |
| 2500.31 | 1.348 | 1.348 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 19.86 | 19.10 | +4.0% | 2.383 | 2.387 |
| 2500.311 | 1.757 | 1.757 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 15.71 | 14.79 | +6.3% | 2.453 | 2.462 |
| 2500.312 | 7.164 | 7.164 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 1.55 | 1.44 | +7.3% | 1.695 | 1.694 |
| 2500.313 | 1.568 | 1.568 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 9.30 | 7.78 | +19.5% | 1.048 | 1.055 |
| 2500.314 | 1.236 | 1.236 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 14.71 | 14.46 | +1.7% | 2.244 | 2.290 |
| 2500.315 | 1.874 | 1.874 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 15.46 | 14.95 | +3.4% | 2.350 | 2.367 |
| 2500.316 | 3.342 | 3.342 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 2.10 | 2.08 | +1.3% | 2.190 | 2.308 |
| 2500.317 | 1.811 | 1.811 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 14.67 | 15.08 | -2.7% | 2.167 | 2.366 |
| 2500.318 | 4.136 | 4.136 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 5.91 | 5.97 | -1.0% | 2.184 | 2.382 |
| 2500.319 | 3.364 | 3.364 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 1.90 | 1.87 | +1.8% | 2.321 | 2.333 |
| 2500.4 | 2.374 | 2.374 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 11.90 | 11.71 | +1.6% | 1.853 | 1.940 |
| 2500.401 | 1.885 | 1.885 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 10.71 | 10.27 | +4.3% | 1.702 | 1.858 |
| 2500.402 | 2.950 | 2.950 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 10.62 | 10.59 | +0.2% | 1.710 | 1.913 |
| 2500.403 | 5.474 | 5.474 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 1.49 | 1.47 | +1.3% | 1.977 | 2.005 |
| 2500.404 | 2.860 | 2.860 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 10.69 | 10.32 | +3.5% | 1.765 | 1.914 |
| 2500.405 | 8.700 | 8.700 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 3.71 | 3.61 | +2.9% | 1.802 | 1.939 |
| 2500.406 | 5.491 | 5.491 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 1.37 | 1.36 | +0.5% | 2.027 | 2.030 |
| 2500.5 | 0.747 | 5.194 | -4.447 ( -85.6% ) | 19.01 | 16.26 | +16.9% | 1.507 | 1.667 |
| 2500.51 | 1.649 | 9.120 | -7.471 ( -81.9% ) | 11.63 | 9.91 | +17.4% | 1.542 | 1.611 |

patinkaew · 2024-09-09T11:16:36Z

Hi @hqucms,

From TestConfigDP_13/testing.log, the problem is Permission denied. This is a new unittest for hltScoutingEra_Run3_2024. This also happened when I was testing before I opened this PR. The file's permission needs to be set as executable, e.g. with chmod 755 . Checking this again, I didn't have 755 mode pushed to the branch. I'm pushing this now, sorry.

cmsbuild · 2024-09-09T11:19:47Z

Pull request #45950 was updated. @AdrianoDee, @antoniovilela, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftorrresd, @hqucms, @kskovpen, @mandrenguyen, @miquork, @rappoccio, @srimanob, @subirsarkar, @sunilUIET can you please check and sign again.

hqucms · 2024-09-09T11:35:19Z

please test

srimanob · 2024-09-10T12:14:48Z

+Upgrade

AdrianoDee · 2024-09-10T12:19:52Z

+pdmv

cmsbuild · 2024-09-10T15:35:46Z

Pull request #45950 was updated. @antoniovilela, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio can you please check and sign again.

patinkaew · 2024-09-10T15:38:47Z

Hi all,

The latest commit fixed the conflict with #45850 which was just merged.

hqucms · 2024-09-10T15:47:32Z

please test

cmsbuild · 2024-09-10T19:05:10Z

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1d01f9/41442/summary.html
COMMIT: 3678aaa
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2024-09-10-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
Additional Tests: NANO
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/45950/41442/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1d01f9/41442/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1d01f9/41442/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

You potentially added 10 lines to the logs
Reco comparison results: 6842 differences found in the comparisons
DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3346561
DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1281
DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 11
DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3345249
DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 204.6949999999999 KiB( 47 files compared)
DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0,... ): 6.777 KiB Ecal/Trends
DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10224.0,... ): -1.712 KiB RPCDigisV/RPCDigis
DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 140.043 ): 0.023 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 140.063 ): 0.004 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
Checked 202 log files, 165 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 46 workflows

NANO Comparison Summary

Summary:

You potentially added 7 lines to the logs
Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 15
DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 17023
DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 17023
DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 14 files compared)
Checked 48 log files, 29 edm output root files, 15 DQM output files

Nano size comparison Summary:

Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.6-size.json
Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.6-size.json
| Sample | kb/ev | ref kb/ev | diff kb/ev | ev/s/thd | ref ev/s/thd | diff rate | mem/thd | ref mem/thd |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2500.0 | 2.783 | 2.783 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 3.88 | 3.99 | -2.9% | 2.255 | 2.126 |
| 2500.001 | 2.897 | 2.897 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 3.49 | 3.56 | -2.1% | 2.687 | 2.551 |
| 2500.002 | 2.843 | 2.843 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 3.59 | 3.70 | -2.9% | 2.667 | 2.530 |
| 2500.01 | 1.446 | 1.446 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 6.75 | 6.85 | -1.5% | 2.367 | 2.229 |
| 2500.011 | 1.906 | 1.906 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 3.65 | 3.66 | -0.4% | 2.557 | 2.383 |
| 2500.012 | 1.761 | 1.761 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 5.31 | 5.40 | -1.5% | 2.474 | 2.297 |
| 2500.1 | 2.354 | 2.354 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 5.01 | 5.19 | -3.6% | 2.088 | 1.983 |
| 2500.2 | 2.459 | 2.459 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 5.72 | 5.93 | -3.6% | 2.001 | 1.887 |
| 2500.21 | 1.286 | 1.286 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 4.14 | 4.23 | -2.3% | 2.299 | 2.153 |
| 2500.211 | 1.668 | 1.668 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 3.68 | 3.91 | -5.9% | 2.372 | 2.187 |
| 2500.3 | 2.229 | 2.229 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 11.41 | 12.44 | -8.3% | 1.985 | 1.908 |
| 2500.301 | 2.833 | 2.833 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 9.83 | 11.10 | -11.4% | 1.967 | 1.965 |
| 2500.31 | 1.348 | 1.348 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 18.05 | 19.94 | -9.5% | 2.388 | 2.372 |
| 2500.311 | 1.757 | 1.757 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 13.88 | 15.56 | -10.8% | 2.465 | 2.317 |
| 2500.312 | 7.164 | 7.164 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 1.47 | 1.59 | -7.4% | 1.697 | 1.696 |
| 2500.313 | 1.568 | 1.568 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 8.59 | 9.17 | -6.2% | 1.050 | 1.049 |
| 2500.314 | 1.236 | 1.236 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 13.59 | 14.32 | -5.1% | 2.284 | 2.108 |
| 2500.315 | 1.874 | 1.874 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 14.17 | 15.84 | -10.5% | 2.376 | 2.340 |
| 2500.316 | 3.342 | 3.342 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 1.99 | 2.08 | -4.4% | 2.314 | 2.132 |
| 2500.317 | 1.811 | 1.811 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 14.12 | 15.08 | -6.3% | 2.370 | 2.306 |
| 2500.318 | 4.136 | 4.136 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 5.59 | 6.02 | -7.1% | 2.380 | 2.323 |
| 2500.319 | 3.364 | 3.364 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 1.79 | 1.87 | -4.4% | 2.342 | 1.954 |
| 2500.4 | 2.374 | 2.374 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 11.26 | 11.91 | -5.4% | 1.944 | 1.823 |
| 2500.401 | 1.885 | 1.885 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 10.00 | 10.85 | -7.8% | 1.864 | 1.822 |
| 2500.402 | 2.950 | 2.950 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 10.02 | 10.60 | -5.5% | 1.917 | 1.709 |
| 2500.403 | 5.474 | 5.474 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 1.41 | 1.47 | -4.5% | 2.003 | 1.939 |
| 2500.404 | 2.860 | 2.860 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 9.93 | 10.69 | -7.1% | 1.921 | 1.894 |
| 2500.405 | 8.700 | 8.700 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 3.44 | 3.65 | -5.8% | 1.939 | 1.774 |
| 2500.406 | 5.491 | 5.491 | 0.000 ( +0.0% ) | 1.30 | 1.36 | -4.6% | 1.998 | 1.986 |
| 2500.5 | 0.747 | 5.194 | -4.447 ( -85.6% ) | 17.75 | 16.42 | +8.1% | 1.627 | 1.439 |
| 2500.51 | 1.649 | 9.120 | -7.471 ( -81.9% ) | 11.14 | 9.84 | +13.3% | 1.547 | 1.587 |

silviodonato · 2024-09-11T11:16:33Z

Only @cms-sw/operations-l2 signature is missing

silviodonato · 2024-09-16T09:05:50Z

@cms-sw/operations-l2 do you see any issues on this backport?

mandrenguyen · 2024-09-16T09:10:55Z

backport of #44970
and #45820

mandrenguyen · 2024-09-16T09:13:46Z

+1

cmsbuild · 2024-09-16T09:14:05Z

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_2_X is complete. This pull request will be automatically merged.

patinkaew added 5 commits September 7, 2024 14:23

introduce run3_scouting_nanoAOD_post2023 modifier and add it to Run3_…

bc4b0ec

…2024

introduce hltScouting, hltScoutingEra_Run3_2024 T0 processing scenari…

944210f

…os with HLTSCOUT datatier as input

add hltScouting scenario in run_CfgTest_8.sh, and add test specifical…

ba41500

…ly for hltScouting scenario in run_CfgTest_13.sh and add it to BuildFile.xml

add relval_nano matrix for ScoutingNano in 14_0_X

d6cebf1

cmsbuild added this to the CMSSW_14_0_X milestone Sep 8, 2024

cmsbuild added operations-pending pending-signatures tests-pending orp-pending pdmv-pending upgrade-pending xpog-pending labels Sep 8, 2024

cmsbuild added tests-started and removed tests-pending labels Sep 9, 2024

cmsbuild added tests-rejected and removed tests-started labels Sep 9, 2024

set run_CfgTest_13.sh file's permision to 755

565b241

cmsbuild added tests-pending and removed tests-rejected labels Sep 9, 2024

cmsbuild added tests-started and removed tests-pending labels Sep 9, 2024

cmsbuild added upgrade-approved and removed upgrade-pending labels Sep 10, 2024

cmsbuild added pdmv-approved and removed pdmv-pending labels Sep 10, 2024

Merge branch 'CMSSW_14_0_X' into scouting_nano_test_14_0_15

3678aaa

cmsbuild added tests-pending and removed tests-approved labels Sep 10, 2024

cmsbuild added tests-started and removed tests-pending labels Sep 10, 2024

cmsbuild added tests-approved and removed tests-started labels Sep 10, 2024

cmsbuild added the backport-ok label Sep 16, 2024

cmsbuild added operations-approved fully-signed orp-approved and removed operations-pending pending-signatures orp-pending labels Sep 16, 2024

cmsbuild merged commit cdb40a2 into cms-sw:CMSSW_14_0_X Sep 16, 2024
11 checks passed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[14_0_X] Backport of 44970 and 45820 (ScoutingNano event content changes for 2024 and T0 scenario for HLTSCOUT datatier) #45950

[14_0_X] Backport of 44970 and 45820 (ScoutingNano event content changes for 2024 and T0 scenario for HLTSCOUT datatier) #45950

patinkaew commented Sep 8, 2024

cmsbuild commented Sep 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

cmsbuild commented Sep 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

hqucms commented Sep 9, 2024

hqucms commented Sep 9, 2024

cmsbuild commented Sep 9, 2024

patinkaew commented Sep 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

cmsbuild commented Sep 9, 2024

hqucms commented Sep 9, 2024

srimanob commented Sep 10, 2024

AdrianoDee commented Sep 10, 2024

cmsbuild commented Sep 10, 2024

patinkaew commented Sep 10, 2024

hqucms commented Sep 10, 2024

cmsbuild commented Sep 10, 2024

silviodonato commented Sep 11, 2024

silviodonato commented Sep 16, 2024

mandrenguyen commented Sep 16, 2024

mandrenguyen commented Sep 16, 2024

cmsbuild commented Sep 16, 2024

[14_0_X] Backport of 44970 and 45820 (ScoutingNano event content changes for 2024 and T0 scenario for HLTSCOUT datatier) #45950

[14_0_X] Backport of 44970 and 45820 (ScoutingNano event content changes for 2024 and T0 scenario for HLTSCOUT datatier) #45950

Conversation

patinkaew commented Sep 8, 2024

PR description:

PR validation:

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

cmsbuild commented Sep 8, 2024 • edited Loading

cmsbuild commented Sep 8, 2024 • edited Loading

hqucms commented Sep 9, 2024

hqucms commented Sep 9, 2024

cmsbuild commented Sep 9, 2024

Unit Tests

Comparison Summary

NANO Comparison Summary

patinkaew commented Sep 9, 2024 • edited Loading

cmsbuild commented Sep 9, 2024

hqucms commented Sep 9, 2024

srimanob commented Sep 10, 2024

AdrianoDee commented Sep 10, 2024

cmsbuild commented Sep 10, 2024

patinkaew commented Sep 10, 2024

hqucms commented Sep 10, 2024

cmsbuild commented Sep 10, 2024

Comparison Summary

NANO Comparison Summary

silviodonato commented Sep 11, 2024

silviodonato commented Sep 16, 2024

mandrenguyen commented Sep 16, 2024

mandrenguyen commented Sep 16, 2024

cmsbuild commented Sep 16, 2024

cmsbuild commented Sep 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

cmsbuild commented Sep 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

patinkaew commented Sep 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading