Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix mismatch between EB and EE recHits in Phase2 supercluster producer configs #45973

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

RSalvatico
Copy link
Contributor

@RSalvatico RSalvatico commented Sep 11, 2024

PR description:

Several Phase2 HLT modules using the PFECALSuperClusterProducer are taking as input the EcalRecHitsEE as barrelRecHits and EcalRecHitsEB as endcapRecHits. These are not used in the building of the moustache supercluster, which is the only supercluster algorithm used online at the moment, also for Phase2. Nevertheless, this is still a nasty bug and could cause problems in the future - they are in fact used for example for the DNN supercluster in PFECALSuperClusterAlgo.

I have not found offline modules with the same issue - I think they are all created by the fillDescription of the PFECALSuperClusterProducer, which is correct.

On the other hand, note that the modules hltParticleFlowSuperClusterECALL1Seeded and hltParticleFlowSuperClusterECALUnseeded in ConfDB present the same issue and should be fixed as well.

PR validation:

As explained above, I would not expect to see differences.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 11, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @RSalvatico for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • HLTrigger/Configuration (hlt)

@Martin-Grunewald, @cmsbuild, @mmusich can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @ReyerBand, @SohamBhattacharya, @VourMa, @argiro, @missirol, @mmusich, @rchatter, @rovere, @silviodonato, @thomreis, @wang0jin this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Sep 11, 2024

type egamma, bug-fix

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Sep 11, 2024

@RSalvatico

On the other hand, note that the modules hltParticleFlowSuperClusterECALL1Seeded and hltParticleFlowSuperClusterECALUnseeded in ConfDB present the same issue and should be fixed as well.

Please open a CMSHLT JIRA ticket for this.

@RSalvatico
Copy link
Contributor Author

@RSalvatico

On the other hand, note that the modules hltParticleFlowSuperClusterECALL1Seeded and hltParticleFlowSuperClusterECALUnseeded in ConfDB present the same issue and should be fixed as well.

Please open a CMSHLT JIRA ticket for this.

For the records:
https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/CMSHLT-3329

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cafbf2/41449/summary.html
COMMIT: c35176a
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_2_X_2024-09-10-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/45973/41449/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Sep 11, 2024

+hlt

  • no changes observed in phase2 trigger decisions, none expected
  • fix uncontroversial

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 195c3b8 into cms-sw:master Sep 11, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants