Properly reference imports for module type #217
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
paul-sachs
changed the title
timostamm
approved these changes
Oct 12, 2023
Merged
paul-sachs
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 12, 2023
## What's Changed * Properly reference imports for module type by @paul-sachs in #217 **Full Changelog**: v0.5.2...v0.5.3
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Due to changes made in #180, exports were referenced as
.jsfiles, which means that all files must subsequently imported with the.jsfull extension because we are declared astype: module.The javascript module system just keeps on giving.
Fixes #216