Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade dotenv from 16.0.0 to 16.0.1 #49

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

d1dee
Copy link
Owner

@d1dee d1dee commented Aug 5, 2022

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade dotenv from 16.0.0 to 16.0.1.

merge advice
As this is a private repository, Snyk-bot does not have access. Therefore, this PR has been created automatically, but appears to have been created by a real user.

✨ Snyk has automatically assigned this pull request, set who gets assigned.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 3 months ago, on 2022-05-10.
Release notes
Package name: dotenv
  • 16.0.1 - 2022-05-10

    Version bump - patch 16.0.1

  • 16.0.0 - 2022-02-02

    Remove multiline on option. Just works now

from dotenv GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: dotenv

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

👩‍💻 Set who automatically gets assigned

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@d1dee d1dee self-assigned this Aug 5, 2022
@d1dee d1dee closed this Sep 19, 2022
@d1dee d1dee deleted the snyk-upgrade-9f9877496383325582ee76d892ab96d7 branch September 19, 2022 13:48
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants