Boolean And should return first falsey value

[readevalprint]

I think boolean And should return the first falsey result like python and not literal False:

>>> True and [] and True
[]

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.0004%) to 99.671% when pulling 3ea190b on readevalprint:master into 164ee88 on danthedeckie:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.0004%) to 99.671% when pulling 3ea190b on readevalprint:master into 164ee88 on danthedeckie:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.0004%) to 99.671% when pulling 39799f9 on readevalprint:master into 164ee88 on danthedeckie:master.

[readevalprint]

I'm not sure why the test passed. I'm getting this result with the master branch:

>>> simple_eval("True and 0")
False

[Birne94]

It most likely works because python booleans are integers under the hood:

In [1]: True == 1
Out[1]: True

In [2]: False == 0
Out[2]: True

[danthedeckie]

Thanks @readevalprint and @Birne94 ! This is great :-)
Sorry I've been away / offline a lot recently so it took me so long.