Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DAOS-15968 container: Fix CAPA fetch on NS master #14511

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

liw
Copy link
Contributor

@liw liw commented Jun 5, 2024

Apparently, when an I/O request fetches a container handle on the engine who is the PS leader, if the ds_cont_hdl object is absent (because the engine has restarted), then the cont_iv code won't create a ds_cont_hdl object, even though the handle is found in the RDB. This patch adds a ds_cont_tgt_open call to cont_iv_ent_fetch, so that the flow is similar to cont_iv_ent_update.

Before requesting gatekeeper:

  • Two review approvals and any prior change requests have been resolved.
  • Testing is complete and all tests passed or there is a reason documented in the PR why it should be force landed and forced-landing tag is set.
  • Features: (or Test-tag*) commit pragma was used or there is a reason documented that there are no appropriate tags for this PR.
  • Commit messages follows the guidelines outlined here.
  • Any tests skipped by the ticket being addressed have been run and passed in the PR.

Gatekeeper:

  • You are the appropriate gatekeeper to be landing the patch.
  • The PR has 2 reviews by people familiar with the code, including appropriate owners.
  • Githooks were used. If not, request that user install them and check copyright dates.
  • Checkpatch issues are resolved. Pay particular attention to ones that will show up on future PRs.
  • All builds have passed. Check non-required builds for any new compiler warnings.
  • Sufficient testing is done. Check feature pragmas and test tags and that tests skipped for the ticket are run and now pass with the changes.
  • If applicable, the PR has addressed any potential version compatibility issues.
  • Check the target branch. If it is master branch, should the PR go to a feature branch? If it is a release branch, does it have merge approval in the JIRA ticket.
  • Extra checks if forced landing is requested
    • Review comments are sufficiently resolved, particularly by prior reviewers that requested changes.
    • No new NLT or valgrind warnings. Check the classic view.
    • Quick-build or Quick-functional is not used.
  • Fix the commit message upon landing. Check the standard here. Edit it to create a single commit. If necessary, ask submitter for a new summary.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 5, 2024

Ticket title is 'dfuse reported "Invalid argument" after an engine restart'
Status is 'In Progress'
https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-15968

@liw liw requested review from liuxuezhao and kccain June 5, 2024 05:51
@liw
Copy link
Contributor Author

liw commented Jun 5, 2024

Asking for draft reviews, for I'm not familiar with the IV code and would like to know if I'm on the wrong path.

Apparently, when an I/O request fetches a container handle on the engine
who is the PS leader, if the ds_cont_hdl object is absent (because the
engine has restarted), then the cont_iv code won't create a ds_cont_hdl
object, even though the handle is found in the RDB. This patch adds a
ds_cont_tgt_open call to cont_iv_ent_fetch, so that the flow is similar
to cont_iv_ent_update.

Signed-off-by: Li Wei <wei.g.li@intel.com>
Required-githooks: true
@liw
Copy link
Contributor Author

liw commented Jun 5, 2024

Rebased to pick up the Ubuntu build fix.

@liw liw marked this pull request as ready for review June 11, 2024 01:10
@liw liw requested review from a team as code owners June 11, 2024 01:10
@NiuYawei NiuYawei merged commit ff1cf6f into master Jun 11, 2024
52 checks passed
@NiuYawei NiuYawei deleted the liw/dfuse-no-hdl branch June 11, 2024 10:22
jolivier23 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2024
Apparently, when an I/O request fetches a container handle on the engine
who is the PS leader, if the ds_cont_hdl object is absent (because the
engine has restarted), then the cont_iv code won't create a ds_cont_hdl
object, even though the handle is found in the RDB. This patch adds a
ds_cont_tgt_open call to cont_iv_ent_fetch, so that the flow is similar
to cont_iv_ent_update.

Signed-off-by: Li Wei <wei.g.li@intel.com>
mjmac pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2024
Apparently, when an I/O request fetches a container handle on the engine
who is the PS leader, if the ds_cont_hdl object is absent (because the
engine has restarted), then the cont_iv code won't create a ds_cont_hdl
object, even though the handle is found in the RDB. This patch adds a
ds_cont_tgt_open call to cont_iv_ent_fetch, so that the flow is similar
to cont_iv_ent_update.

Signed-off-by: Li Wei <wei.g.li@intel.com>
liw added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2024
Apparently, when an I/O request fetches a container handle on the engine
who is the PS leader, if the ds_cont_hdl object is absent (because the
engine has restarted), then the cont_iv code won't create a ds_cont_hdl
object, even though the handle is found in the RDB. This patch adds a
ds_cont_tgt_open call to cont_iv_ent_fetch, so that the flow is similar
to cont_iv_ent_update.

Signed-off-by: Li Wei <wei.g.li@intel.com>
Required-githooks: true
gnailzenh pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
Apparently, when an I/O request fetches a container handle on the engine
who is the PS leader, if the ds_cont_hdl object is absent (because the
engine has restarted), then the cont_iv code won't create a ds_cont_hdl
object, even though the handle is found in the RDB. This patch adds a
ds_cont_tgt_open call to cont_iv_ent_fetch, so that the flow is similar
to cont_iv_ent_update.

Signed-off-by: Li Wei <wei.g.li@intel.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants