Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feature Request] test: test JIT interface for all models #3518

Closed
njzjz opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3767
Closed

[Feature Request] test: test JIT interface for all models #3518

njzjz opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3767
Assignees
@njzjz
Labels
enhancement
Milestone
v3.0.0

Comments

@njzjz
Copy link
Member

njzjz commented Mar 19, 2024

No description provided.

@njzjz njzjz added this to the v3.0.0 milestone Mar 19, 2024
@njzjz njzjz self-assigned this May 1, 2024
njzjz added a commit to njzjz/deepmd-kit that referenced this issue May 10, 2024
@njzjz
test(pt): add common test case for model/atomic model
d85befd 
Fix deepmodeling#3501. Fix deepmodeling#3517. Fix deepmodeling#3518.

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
@njzjz njzjz mentioned this issue May 10, 2024
Merged
@njzjz njzjz linked a pull request May 10, 2024 that will close this issue
test(pt): add common test case for model/atomic model #3767
Merged
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 23, 2024
@njzjz @coderabbitai
test(pt): add common test case for model/atomic model (#3767)
dd97895 
Fix #3501. Fix #3517. Fix #3518.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit


- **Tests**
- Expanded testing capabilities for atomic and energy models to improve
accuracy and reliability in energy calculations.
- Implemented new test cases for atomic and energy models, along with
common model test cases, to validate diverse functionalities and
calculations.
- Introduced test case classes for atomic and energy models with methods
to assess parameters, types, outputs, and forward computations.
- Added utility functions for testing PyTorch-based deep learning models
with a custom backend.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@njzjz njzjz closed this as completed May 23, 2024
mtaillefumier pushed a commit to mtaillefumier/deepmd-kit that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2024
@njzjz @coderabbitai @mtaillefumier
test(pt): add common test case for model/atomic model (deepmodeling#3767
a3f901c 
)

Fix deepmodeling#3501. Fix deepmodeling#3517. Fix deepmodeling#3518.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit


- **Tests**
- Expanded testing capabilities for atomic and energy models to improve
accuracy and reliability in energy calculations.
- Implemented new test cases for atomic and energy models, along with
common model test cases, to validate diverse functionalities and
calculations.
- Introduced test case classes for atomic and energy models with methods
to assess parameters, types, outputs, and forward computations.
- Added utility functions for testing PyTorch-based deep learning models
with a custom backend.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@njzjz njzjz

Labels
enhancement
Projects
Multiple backend support for DeePMD-kit
Archived in project
DeePMD-3.0.0 beta release
Archived in project
Milestone
v3.0.0
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

test(pt): add common test case for model/atomic model njzjz/deepmd-kit
1 participant
@njzjz