Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fix] Wrap log_path with Path #4117

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

HydrogenSulfate
Copy link
Contributor

@HydrogenSulfate HydrogenSulfate commented Sep 10, 2024

FLAGS.log_path need to be wrapped into Path type, or will raise error when call .parent.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Improvements
    • Enhanced handling of log file paths for better compatibility and functionality in file operations.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the main function in the deepmd/pt/entrypoints/main.py file by changing how the log_path parameter is passed to the set_log_handles function. Instead of passing FLAGS.log_path directly, it now wraps this value in a Path object from the pathlib module. This adjustment improves the handling of file paths while maintaining the existing control flow and logic of the function.

Changes

Files Change Summary
deepmd/pt/entrypoints/main.py Modified main function to wrap FLAGS.log_path in a Path object.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Main
    participant LogHandler

    User->>Main: Call main()
    Main->>LogHandler: set_log_handles(Path(FLAGS.log_path))
    LogHandler-->>Main: Log handles set
    Main-->>User: Execution continues
Loading

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 31edbb1 and 5466939.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • deepmd/pt/entrypoints/main.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • deepmd/pt/entrypoints/main.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.02%. Comparing base (5111e9b) to head (5466939).
Report is 14 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##            devel    #4117    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   83.02%   83.02%            
========================================
  Files         524      532     +8     
  Lines       51638    52187   +549     
  Branches     3030     3030            
========================================
+ Hits        42870    43330   +460     
- Misses       7822     7911    +89     
  Partials      946      946            

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@njzjz
Copy link
Member

njzjz commented Sep 10, 2024

It seems that the default value of FLAGS.log_path is None. Please consider this situation.

@HydrogenSulfate
Copy link
Contributor Author

It seems that the default value of FLAGS.log_path is None. Please consider this situation.

You are right, it should be same as

"""
set_log_handles(args.log_level, Path(args.log_path) if args.log_path else None)

Signed-off-by: HydrogenSulfate <490868991@qq.com>
@njzjz njzjz added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 11, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 11, 2024
@njzjz njzjz added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit 8b8d12d Sep 12, 2024
61 checks passed
mtaillefumier pushed a commit to mtaillefumier/deepmd-kit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
`FLAGS.log_path` need to be wrapped into `Path` type, or will raise
error when call `.parent`.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit


- **Improvements**
- Enhanced handling of log file paths for better compatibility and
functionality in file operations.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Signed-off-by: HydrogenSulfate <490868991@qq.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants