Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix the usage of pair_coeff #567

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2021
Merged

fix the usage of pair_coeff #567

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2021

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Oct 11, 2021

The bare pair_coeff is not supported in the latest version of LAMMPS. pair_coeff * * should be used instead.

Fix deepmodeling/deepmd-kit#1201.

The bare `pair_coeff` is not supported in the latest version of LAMMPS. `pair_coeff * *` should be used instead.

Fix deepmodeling/deepmd-kit#1201.
@njzjz njzjz requested a review from amcadmus October 11, 2021 08:02
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ def make_lammps_input(ensemble,
if ele_temp_a is not None:
keywords += "aparam ${ELE_TEMP}"
ret+= "pair_style deepmd %s out_freq ${THERMO_FREQ} out_file model_devi.out %s\n" % (graph_list, keywords)
ret+= "pair_coeff \n"
ret+= "pair_coeff * *\n"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this change compatible with the previous versions?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes

@amcadmus amcadmus merged commit d498c6f into deepmodeling:devel Oct 11, 2021
@njzjz njzjz deleted the patch-3 branch November 9, 2021 09:04
Cloudac7 pushed a commit to Cloudac7/dpgen that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2021
The bare `pair_coeff` is not supported in the latest version of LAMMPS. `pair_coeff * *` should be used instead.

Fix deepmodeling/deepmd-kit#1201.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants