Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make Autotest compatible with the new version of dpdispatcher. #667

Merged
merged 30 commits into from
Mar 24, 2022

Conversation

AnguseZhang
Copy link
Collaborator

The purpose of this PR is:

  1. Fix bugs such that dpgen autotest can run with the new version of dpdispatcher, instead of Dispatcher implemented in DP-GEN.
  2. Delete multiprocessing in common_equi, such that there's only one dispatcher in this function. Meantime, we still keep multiprocessing in common_prop, and each property will have one dispatcher.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 13, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #667 (b460d0b) into devel (7d2c1de) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel     #667      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   33.92%   33.95%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          86       86              
  Lines       15432    15415      -17     
==========================================
- Hits         5235     5234       -1     
+ Misses      10197    10181      -16     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
dpgen/auto_test/common_equi.py 61.48% <0.00%> (+6.57%) ⬆️
dpgen/auto_test/common_prop.py 38.25% <0.00%> (-0.26%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7d2c1de...b460d0b. Read the comment docs.

@AnguseZhang AnguseZhang merged commit 8cd50da into deepmodeling:devel Mar 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants