Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with recommendation (or the very existence of this product) #2641

Closed
xavier-90 opened this issue Sep 14, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2642
Closed

Issue with recommendation (or the very existence of this product) #2641

xavier-90 opened this issue Sep 14, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2642

Comments

@xavier-90
Copy link

I quote: "Carefully consider before using this approach in production. Experience has shown that the simplicity of this deployment strategy is outweighed by the issues it creates. Consider using SQL scripts instead."

So what is the raison d'etre of this product? What is the point in spending any time at all developing migration scripts if ultimately we also have to spend time developing SQL scripts to migrate production servers?

I understand the caution and the recommendation not to include the scripts in the primary application but surely the migration mechanism can form part of a separate application/process to upgrade production servers under controlled conditions?


Document Details

Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

@ErikEJ
Copy link
Contributor

ErikEJ commented Sep 14, 2020

@xavier-90 the tooling creates the SQL script for you.

roji added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2020
roji added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2020
@roji roji self-assigned this Sep 14, 2020
@roji roji added this to the 5.0.0 milestone Sep 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants