Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update providers to version 5.0 #2912

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2020
Merged

Update providers to version 5.0 #2912

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2020

Conversation

roji
Copy link
Member

@roji roji commented Nov 28, 2020

Closes #2919

@roji roji requested a review from a team November 28, 2020 15:01
@mguinness
Copy link
Contributor

Pomelo.EntityFrameworkCore.MySql supports 5.0 in prerelease, can that be noted as such?

@roji
Copy link
Member Author

roji commented Dec 1, 2020

@mguinness I'm assuming the 5.0 release is not far off, let's just update that at that point...

| [Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory) | EF Core in-memory database | [EF Core Project](https://github.com/dotnet/efcore/) (Microsoft) | [Limitations](xref:core/testing/in-memory) | 3.1 | [docs](xref:core/providers/in-memory/index) |
| [Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Cosmos](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Cosmos) | Azure Cosmos DB SQL API | [EF Core Project](https://github.com/dotnet/efcore/) (Microsoft) | | 3.1 | [docs](xref:core/providers/cosmos/index) |
| [Npgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Npgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL) | PostgreSQL | [Npgsql Development Team](https://github.com/npgsql) | | 3.1 | [docs](https://www.npgsql.org/efcore/index.html) |
| [Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer) | SQL Server 2012 onwards | [EF Core Project](https://github.com/dotnet/efcore/) (Microsoft) | | 5.0 | [docs](xref:core/providers/sql-server/index) |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we update everything to 5.0 removing 3.1 or should we leave 3.1 in? as 3.1 is LTS.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm... Maybe we change the column title to "Latest supported version", and implicitly 5.0 means that 3.1 is also supported? Just to keep things simple and convey the important information.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Built for version updates
4 participants