This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2023. It is now read-only.
Jit: fix a few issues with single def local tracking #10633
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes for three issues that came up in desktop testing.
Don't track class types for locals when in import only mode,
since the jit may be looking at an uninstantiated generic method.
In these cases the jit's use of TYP_REF to represent CORINFO_TYPE_VAR
confuses the tracking code. In import only mode the jit is not going
to use the information, so there is no need to track it at all.
Import only mode is tied to verification and CoreCLR runs in full
trust mode, so no test was added.
Allow
lvaUpdateClass
to be called more than once but assertthat the second and subsequent calls provide the exact same update
as the first call.
This can happen for single def ref class locals whose definition
block is reimported. Reimportation is triggered by some tolerable
non-ref type mismatches at block joins and so ref type information
should be consistent for each importation attempt.
Add a couple of IL test cases translated from destkop MC++ tests
that will trigger this kind of reimportation.
Bail out of devirtualization (for desktop only) if the base class
has precise initialization semantics, since desktop seems to trigger
class initialization for ref type callvirts (contrary to ECMA355 I.8.9.5).
See #4853 for some discussion. Since this is desktop only behavior
no test was added.