Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support mapping to fields #6269

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2016
Merged

Support mapping to fields #6269

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2016

Conversation

ajcvickers
Copy link
Member

Issues #4357, #4855

This change adds fluent and lower-level APIs to set backing fields or properties with no fields as well as conventions for using the fields and a mechanism to provide control over when the property is used and when the field is used.

Also see #6266, #6267, and #6268.

/cc @rowanmiller for API and docs

@anpete
Copy link
Contributor

anpete commented Aug 9, 2016

@ajcvickers Any guidance on specific areas of this to review?

@ajcvickers
Copy link
Member Author

@anpete Probably the biggest change is the way fields are found and set in metadata when using the convention or the API. Then possibly the rules for choosing a field or a property based on mode.

@anpete
Copy link
Contributor

anpete commented Aug 9, 2016

:shipit:

[NotNull] this IPropertyBase propertyBase,
bool forConstruction,
bool forSet)
{
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider using an out parameter or return a Tuple

@AndriySvyryd
Copy link
Member

:shipit:

Issues #4357, #4855

This change adds fluent and lower-level APIs to set backing fields or properties with no fields as well as conventions for using the fields and a mechanism to provide control over when the property is used and when the field is used.

Also see #6266, #6267, and #6268.
@ajcvickers ajcvickers merged commit b0c503d into dev Aug 10, 2016
@smitpatel smitpatel deleted the HasField0728 branch August 10, 2016 23:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants