Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sliding Sync: Shortcut for checking if certain background updates have completed #17724

Merged

Conversation

MadLittleMods
Copy link
Contributor

@MadLittleMods MadLittleMods commented Sep 17, 2024

Shortcut for checking if certain background updates have completed

Pulling this change out from one of @erikjohnston's branches (develop...erikj/ss_perf)

Pull Request Checklist

  • Pull request is based on the develop branch
  • Pull request includes a changelog file. The entry should:
    • Be a short description of your change which makes sense to users. "Fixed a bug that prevented receiving messages from other servers." instead of "Moved X method from EventStore to EventWorkerStore.".
    • Use markdown where necessary, mostly for code blocks.
    • End with either a period (.) or an exclamation mark (!).
    • Start with a capital letter.
    • Feel free to credit yourself, by adding a sentence "Contributed by @github_username." or "Contributed by [Your Name]." to the end of the entry.
  • Code style is correct
    (run the linters)

@MadLittleMods MadLittleMods marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2024 02:36
@MadLittleMods MadLittleMods requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2024 02:36
@MadLittleMods MadLittleMods merged commit 61b7c31 into develop Sep 18, 2024
39 checks passed
@MadLittleMods MadLittleMods deleted the madlittlemods/faster_background_update_complete_check branch September 18, 2024 18:12
@MadLittleMods
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review @devonh 🦞

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants