fix: Restructure dependencies and fix for launchbar not visible issues #923
Conversation
WalkthroughThe update enhances the Espressif IDE by incorporating additional bundles and altering the product configuration to a mixed type. It updates dependencies, particularly from the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (1 hunks)
- releng/com.espressif.idf.product/idf.product (2 hunks)
- releng/com.espressif.idf.target/com.espressif.idf.target.target (4 hunks)
- releng/com.espressif.idf.update/category.xml (3 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Additional comments not posted (5)
bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (1)
17-31: Adding multipleorg.apache.batikbundles increases the project's dependencies on external libraries, particularly for rendering and graphical functionalities. Ensure that these libraries are necessary for the project's goals and that their versions are compatible with the rest of the project's dependencies. Additionally, consider the impact on the project's size and performance.releng/com.espressif.idf.product/idf.product (1)
4-4: Changing the product type from "features" to "mixed" and including a new feature (org.eclipse.tm4e.feature) indicates an intention to enrich the Espressif-IDE's feature set. Ensure that this change aligns with the project's goals and that the new feature integrates well with existing functionalities. Additionally, verify that all necessary dependencies for the new feature are correctly specified elsewhere in the project configuration.releng/com.espressif.idf.update/category.xml (1)
79-156: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [31-148]
Updating the category names for various bundles from "com.espressif.idf" to "com.espressif.idf.dependencies" indicates a reorganization of dependency management within the project. Ensure that this change is reflected in all relevant documentation and that it aligns with the project's overall structure and dependency management strategy. Additionally, verify that all references to these categories in the project's build and deployment scripts are updated accordingly.
releng/com.espressif.idf.target/com.espressif.idf.target.target (2)
72-90: Updating versions and adding neworg.apache.batikunits indicate an effort to leverage newer functionalities or fixes from these libraries. Ensure that these updated versions are compatible with the project's existing dependencies and that they do not introduce any breaking changes. It's also important to verify that all necessary licenses for these updated and new dependencies are compliant with the project's licensing policy.
121-141: The addition of new dependencies related toorg.eclipse.lsp4eandorg.eclipse.tm4esuggests an enhancement in language server and text mate engine functionalities. Ensure that these additions are necessary for the project's goals and that their versions are compatible with the rest of the project's dependencies. Additionally, consider the impact of these new dependencies on the project's size, performance, and licensing compliance.
| @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ | |||
| <feature id="org.eclipse.swtchart.feature" installMode="root"/> | |||
| <feature id="org.eclipse.nebula.widgets.xviewer.feature" installMode="root"/> | |||
| <feature id="org.eclipse.cdt.lsp.feature" installMode="root"/> | |||
| <feature id="org.eclipse.tm4e.feature" installMode="root"/> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The addition of the org.eclipse.tm4e.feature feature should be accompanied by thorough testing to ensure it integrates seamlessly with the existing features and does not introduce any regressions. Consider adding automated tests that cover the new functionalities introduced by this feature.
Would you like assistance in creating automated tests for the new feature?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@kolipakakondal, to assist you in creating automated tests for the org.eclipse.tm4e.feature, I'll provide some example test cases that you can adapt or extend based on the specific functionalities introduced by this feature in the Espressif IDE. Since org.eclipse.tm4e.feature is likely related to text mate support, the tests will focus on verifying syntax highlighting, theming, and other editor enhancements.
Example Test Cases
1. Syntax Highlighting Test
This test verifies that syntax highlighting works as expected for a given language supported by the Espressif IDE.
@Test
public void testSyntaxHighlighting() {
// Open a file known to have specific syntax highlighting rules
IFile file = openTestFile("path/to/test/file");
// Verify that syntax highlighting is applied correctly
// This step might require a way to inspect the editor's syntax highlighting programmatically or through UI automation
assertTrue("Syntax highlighting is not applied as expected", verifySyntaxHighlighting(file));
}2. Theming Test
This test checks if changing themes updates the editor's appearance according to the selected theme.
@Test
public void testTheming() {
// Change the IDE theme to a known theme
setIDETheme("Dark Theme");
// Open a file to inspect the editor's appearance
IFile file = openTestFile("path/to/test/file");
// Verify that the editor's appearance matches the expected appearance of the "Dark Theme"
// This might involve checking the background color, text color, etc., through UI automation
assertTrue("Editor appearance does not match the expected dark theme", verifyEditorAppearance(file, "Dark Theme"));
}3. Integration Test with Existing Features
This test ensures that the introduction of org.eclipse.tm4e.feature does not interfere with existing features of the Espressif IDE.
@Test
public void testFeatureIntegration() {
// Perform actions that involve both the new feature and existing features
// For example, open a file with syntax highlighting and perform a build using the Espressif IDE's build system
// Verify that both the new and existing features work as expected
assertTrue("New feature interferes with existing features", verifyFeatureIntegration());
}Please adapt these examples to fit the specific functionalities introduced by org.eclipse.tm4e.feature in your project. You might need to implement helper methods like openTestFile, verifySyntaxHighlighting, setIDETheme, verifyEditorAppearance, and verifyFeatureIntegration based on your project's architecture and testing framework.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
Additional Context Used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
Additional Context Used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
Additional Context Used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
Additional Context Used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
Additional Context Used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
Additional Context Used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (1 hunks)
- releng/com.espressif.idf.target/com.espressif.idf.target.target (4 hunks)
- releng/com.espressif.idf.update/category.xml (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
- releng/com.espressif.idf.update/category.xml
Additional comments not posted (3)
releng/com.espressif.idf.target/com.espressif.idf.target.target (3)
72-77: The versions fororg.apache.batikunits have been updated to1.16.0.v20221027-0840. Ensure that these updates are compatible with other components of the project that may rely onorg.apache.batik. Compatibility issues could arise from major version changes.Verification successful
Given the limitations encountered with
ast-grepfor XML files, let's userg(ripgrep) to search for references toorg.apache.batikunits within the project. This will help us assess if there are direct references to the specific version1.16.0.v20221027-0840that could indicate compatibility issues.
The search for references to
org.apache.batikunits with the version1.16.0.v20221027-0840within the project only returned entries within thecom.espressif.idf.target.targetconfiguration file. This suggests that the updates to theorg.apache.batikunits are localized to this specific configuration and do not appear elsewhere in the project. While this does not directly indicate compatibility issues, it is recommended to perform further compatibility checks, possibly including runtime testing or reviewing documentation fororg.apache.batikand related project components, to ensure that these updates do not introduce issues.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify compatibility of org.apache.batik updates with other project components ast-grep --lang xml --pattern $'unit id="org.apache.batik.$$$" version="1.16.0.v20221027-0840"'Length of output: 203
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to org.apache.batik units with the version 1.16.0.v20221027-0840 in the project rg "org.apache.batik.*1.16.0.v20221027-0840"Length of output: 1126
108-115: The addition oforg.eclipse.lsp4eunits with specific versions indicates an enhancement in language support features. It's crucial to verify that these versions are stable and have been tested for compatibility with the project's existing setup.
117-127: The inclusion oforg.eclipse.tm4eunits suggests enhancements in text management capabilities. Confirm that the added features align with project requirements and do not introduce unnecessary complexity or performance overhead.
| <repository location="https://download.eclipse.org/lsp4e/releases/0.25.0/"/> | ||
| <unit id="com.google.gson" version="2.10.1"/> | ||
| <unit id="org.eclipse.lsp4e" version="0.18.6.202403050753"/> | ||
| <unit id="org.eclipse.lsp4e.debug" version="0.15.7.202402141138"/> | ||
| <unit id="org.eclipse.lsp4j" version="0.22.0.v20240213-2011"/> | ||
| <unit id="org.eclipse.lsp4j.debug" version="0.22.0.v20240213-2011"/> | ||
| <unit id="org.eclipse.lsp4j.jsonrpc" version="0.22.0.v20240213-2011"/> | ||
| <unit id="org.eclipse.lsp4j.jsonrpc.debug" version="0.22.0.v20240213-2011"/> | ||
| </location> | ||
| <location includeAllPlatforms="false" includeConfigurePhase="false" includeMode="planner" includeSource="true" type="InstallableUnit"> | ||
| <repository location="https://download.eclipse.org/tm4e/releases/0.9.0/"/> | ||
| <unit id="com.google.gson" version="2.10.1"/> | ||
| <unit id="org.apache.batik.constants" version="1.16.0.v20221027-0840"/> | ||
| <unit id="org.apache.batik.css" version="1.16.0.v20221027-0840"/> | ||
| <unit id="org.apache.batik.util" version="1.16.0.v20221027-0840"/> | ||
| <unit id="org.eclipse.tm4e.feature.feature.group" version="0.9.0.202401090933"/> | ||
| <unit id="org.eclipse.tm4e.language_pack.feature.feature.group" version="0.9.0.202401090933"/> | ||
| <unit id="org.jcodings" version="1.0.58"/> | ||
| <unit id="org.joni" version="2.2.1"/> | ||
| <unit id="org.snakeyaml.engine" version="2.7.0"/> | ||
| </location> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The addition of new dependencies related to org.eclipse.lsp4e and org.eclipse.tm4e could potentially introduce new features to the project. It's important to ensure that these features are documented properly to aid in future maintenance and development efforts.
Would you like assistance in updating the documentation to reflect these new dependencies and their functionalities?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (1 hunks)
- releng/com.espressif.idf.update/category.xml (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- bundles/com.espressif.idf.lsp/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
- releng/com.espressif.idf.update/category.xml
kolipakakondal
changed the title
|
@kolipakakondal @sigmaaa hi ! Tested under: OS - Windows 10 Do not see toolbar.
|
kolipakakondal
force-pushed
the
launchbar_issues
branch
from
b754a43
to
d9cae72
Compare
|
Hi @AndriiFilippov It's fixed, could you check now. |
|
@kolipakakondal hi ! Do see toolbar still visible after restart or exit IDE. LGTM 👍 |
Description
Restructure dependencies and fix for launchbar not visible issues
Fixes # (IEP-XXX)
Type of change
How has this been tested?
Test Configuration:
Dependent components impacted by this PR:
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit