Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve findinstances handling of Swift subclasses #219

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 5, 2018

Conversation

kastiglione
Copy link
Contributor

Calling findinstances currently requires the exact class name. For classes implemented in Swift, the name includes the module name, for example SuperKit.DuperClass. This change allows findinstances to be called with simply the class name (DuperClass in the previous example).

Note: This change does handle the case where more than one module contains a class by that name. For example, if two modules each define a class named User, then running findinstances User will list instances of both classes.

This pull request also includes a few other small improvements.

export INSTALL_NAME = ""
ifneq ($(LD_DYLIB_INSTALL_NAME), "")
export INSTALL_NAME =
ifneq ($(LD_DYLIB_INSTALL_NAME),)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@keith does this change look legit? The original here was still adding LD_DYLIB_INSTALL_NAME=... to xcodebuild command, but this change appears to fix that.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yea seems fine, shouldn't have had the quotes in the first place I think, my bad.

@keith
Copy link
Contributor

keith commented Jan 5, 2018

Super nice improvement!

@kastiglione kastiglione merged commit e3f30d0 into master Jan 5, 2018
@kastiglione kastiglione deleted the findinstances-swift-subclasses branch January 15, 2018 20:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants