Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove comment about locking about TestIterateAgainstExpected #11695

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hx235
Copy link
Contributor

@hx235 hx235 commented Aug 11, 2023

Context/Summary
After #11058, we no longer lock the key range to iterate in TestIterateAgainstExpected, except for working with timestamp feature.

Test: no code change

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hx235 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

Copy link
Contributor

@ajkr ajkr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, LGTM

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hx235 merged this pull request in 38ecfab.

rockeet pushed a commit to topling/toplingdb that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2023
Summary:
**Context/Summary**
After facebook/rocksdb#11058, we no longer lock the key range to iterate in TestIterateAgainstExpected, except for working with timestamp feature.

Pull Request resolved: facebook/rocksdb#11695

Test Plan: no code change

Reviewed By: ajkr

Differential Revision: D48276668

Pulled By: hx235

fbshipit-source-id: dc92a3708b2281dc737c0877fb755548bf03a9fc
rockeet pushed a commit to topling/toplingdb that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2024
Summary:
**Context/Summary**
After facebook/rocksdb#11058, we no longer lock the key range to iterate in TestIterateAgainstExpected, except for working with timestamp feature.

Pull Request resolved: facebook/rocksdb#11695

Test Plan: no code change

Reviewed By: ajkr

Differential Revision: D48276668

Pulled By: hx235

fbshipit-source-id: dc92a3708b2281dc737c0877fb755548bf03a9fc
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants