-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 826
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Scroll to edited post or inform the user #2108
Conversation
@the-turk Thanks for another nice PR! Keep 'em coming. 👍 As you can see, we have a lot of open PRs currently. Our top goal right now is to keep our focus on the stable release, and our planned path to get there. As this issue (#634) was originally planned for a later release, it might take a while until we get around to further reviews (and merging it). Now that so much work has already been done, that does not mean we cannot merge a good PR if we find the time, but I wanted to explain what we're trying to keep in mind when choosing what to review next, in order to avoid confusion or disappointment. We are trying hard not to get sidetracked in our focus, and our resources are limited. Thanks for your understanding - and your contribution! 🤗 |
Thanks @franzliedke, I appreciate that! I'm aware of your priorities and hard work. I just wanted to lighten the load on y'all in my free time and these are just my humble contributions. I'll leave it here for future reference but I should say that I'm not happy with using the same code multiple times either, feel free to close it if you've got better ideas to add the feature. Thanks again. 🤜 |
Because we now auto-format our JS code with Prettier, this branch now has conflicts with Please take the steps outlined in the forum to resolve the conflicts. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, just needs a rebase. Thanks!
Did I do this right? 🙈 what the hell am supossed to do with the lock file |
@the-turk The lock file comes from This is basically the same logic as the reply alert, right? Not sure if any of it can be moved into a common place so there's less duplication, if that's true. |
hey @datitisev, that's true
|
Not sure if we want to simply stuff in this PR or make it separate. 🤷 Either works for me. |
For this case in particular, I'm fine having the code structure repeated. It's only really used twice, if we have to add it again, then we can try to abstract it out. Additionally, there's enough differences between the two that abstracting out the logic would likely create a messier codebase, not a cleaner one |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have checked this out and confirmed that it works locally. Thank you for the PR!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just looking at the code, looking fine for me
We never merged the locale strings for this PR... |
Fixes #634
Changes proposed in this pull request:
Pretty much copy/pasted from ReplyComposer.
Reviewers should focus on:
Confirmed
composer test
).Required changes: