feat: Support orientation change for session replay

[brustolin]

📜 Description

Session replay will adapt to screen size changes, that usually happens during orientation change.

💚 How did you test it?

Sample and Unit tests

📝 Checklist

You have to check all boxes before merging:

• I reviewed the submitted code.
• I added tests to verify the changes.
• No new PII added or SDK only sends newly added PII if sendDefaultPII is enabled.
• I updated the docs if needed.
• Review from the native team if needed.
• No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.
• No breaking change for hybrid SDKs or communicated to hybrid SDKs.

🔮 Next steps

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.35028% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.480%. Comparing base (61249fb) to head (748b30b).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...egrations/SessionReplay/SentryOnDemandReplay.swift	91.250%	7 Missing ⚠️
Sources/Sentry/SentrySessionReplayIntegration.m	89.473%	2 Missing ⚠️
...tegrations/SessionReplay/SentrySessionReplay.swift	92.857%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##              main     #4194       +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage   91.350%   91.480%   +0.129%     
=============================================
  Files          610       611        +1     
  Lines        48963     49251      +288     
  Branches     17596     17810      +214     
=============================================
+ Hits         44728     45055      +327     
+ Misses        4142      4103       -39     
  Partials        93        93               

Files	Coverage Δ
...rations/SessionReplay/SentryReplayVideoMaker.swift	100.000% <ø> (ø)
...ions/SessionReplay/SentryOnDemandReplayTests.swift	98.400% <100.000%> (+0.461%)	⬆️
...onReplay/SentrySessionReplayIntegrationTests.swift	98.445% <100.000%> (+0.619%)	⬆️
...tions/SessionReplay/SentrySessionReplayTests.swift	97.419% <100.000%> (-0.214%)	⬇️
...tegrations/SessionReplay/SentrySessionReplay.swift	91.975% <92.857%> (+1.672%)	⬆️
Sources/Sentry/SentrySessionReplayIntegration.m	85.116% <89.473%> (+1.025%)	⬆️
...egrations/SessionReplay/SentryOnDemandReplay.swift	91.823% <91.250%> (+1.382%)	⬆️

... and 45 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 61249fb...748b30b. Read the comment docs.

[philipphofmann]

I have a couple of questions, almost LGTM.

[philipphofmann]

Maybe it makes sense to mention why we don't need to run anything async for resumePreviousSessionReplay as crash events are captured from a background thread, as mentioned here #4194 (comment).

LGTM.