Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't immediately lookup the linked binding associated with @ImplementedBy. Instead, defer it like a normal bind(X.class).to(Y.class) does. This ensures that later bindings of Y are used. #1709

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link

Don't immediately lookup the linked binding associated with @ImplementedBy. Instead, defer it like a normal bind(X.class).to(Y.class) does. This ensures that later bindings of Y are used.

Much thanks goes to @nineninesevenfour for their investigation (in #1650), which made fixing this much easier.

Fixes #700 and fixes #1650.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

binding order matters when requireExplicitBindings is on
0 participants